My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 10/29/75
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1970-1979
>
1975
>
PC 10/29/75
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2017 11:55:14 AM
Creation date
4/30/2007 2:47:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
10/29/1975
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 10/29/75
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4y$~8A"~~~ CITY of PLEASA TON <br />N <br />,~ .~,. <br />~~~° Planning Commission <br />rrs9 <br />MINUTES ~OF REGULAR MEETING. <br />DGfie ; October 29, 1975 <br />Time : 8:0o P.M. <br />PIcCe; Pleasanton Justice Court <br />would do what needs to be done while <br />allowing needed flexibility to accom- <br />modate the problems which have been <br />brought up by the developers present. <br />Some discussion ensued on precise <br />wording of the resolution which <br />needed to be adopted. The Commis- <br />sioners, particularly Commissioner <br />Carrigan, expressed tremendous <br />frustration at having to take such <br />a stance, which is not the answer <br />for Pleasanton. <br />ADJOURNMENT <br />Mr. Edgar stated that there is always` <br />the possibility of local funding <br />but the problem with that is that the <br />Federal Government also must issue <br />what is known as an MPDS permit, <br />and under such a procedure they have <br />a great deal of control on the size <br />and type of sewage treatment plant <br />constructed. I <br />It was the general feeling among the <br />Commissioners that at this point ', <br />they did not have much of a choice, <br />but to go ahead and recommend the <br />position so stated in the draft reso- <br />lution included in their packet. <br />Accordingly, Resolution No. 1376 was <br />unanimously adopted by those present <br />spelling out the items spelled out <br />in Sections 1 through 3 of that <br />resolution. <br />The special meeting of the Planning <br />Commissi was adjourned at 9:45 P.M. <br />l <br />Rober arris, Secretary <br />-7- <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.