My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 03/10/82
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1982
>
PC 03/10/82
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 4:27:41 PM
Creation date
4/30/2007 2:24:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/10/1982
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 03/10/82
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mr. Kierstead stated that Prudential Insurance, alone has enough <br />acres to force them in the assessment district. He referred to an <br />assessment at Crow Canyon for widening of the streets and that the <br />estimated costs was missed by 70g. <br />Fred Houston, 4461 Sandalwood, Pleasanton, urged the Planning Com- <br />mission not to impose the mitigated conditions mentioned as it <br />will drive up the cost of the project and be distributed back to <br />the citizens. <br />The public hearing was closed. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Jamieson, seconded by Commissioner <br />Lindsey, that the mitigated negative declaration be adopted for <br />this project because conditions of project approval would reduce any <br />potential significant adverse environmental effects to an insigni- <br />ficant level. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />Ayes: Commissioners Doherty, Jamieson, Lindsey, Wilson and <br />Chairperson Getty <br />Noes: None <br />Absent: None <br />Abstain: None <br />Resolution No. 2144 was then entered and adopted recommending approval <br />of the mitigated negative declaration as motioned. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Doherty, seconded by Commissioner <br />Jamieson that case PUD-82-2 be recommended for approval subject to the <br />conditions shown in the staff report to the Commission dated 3/10/82 <br />with the following changes: <br />33. That suitable trees shall be planted to fill in <br />the vacant areas between the Eucalyptus trees on the <br />eastern property line; that trees shall be planted <br />along the southern property line of the subject pro- <br />perty and that a final landscape plan reflecting <br />these additions shall be submitted to the Planning <br />staff for approval prior to issuance of building <br />permits. <br />35. That where required by the Fire Department, the <br />buildings shall be equipped with fire sprinklers <br />and alarm systems approved by the Fire Department. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />Ayes: Commissioners Doherty, Jamieson, Lindsey and Wilson <br />Noes: Chairperson Getty <br />Absent: None <br />Abstain: None <br />Resolution No. 2145 was then entered and adopted recommending approval <br />of PUD-82-2. <br />-5- <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.