PC 03/10/82 - Laserfiche WebLink

Commissioner Lindsey asked about the imposition of this condition on other developments in the area. Mr. Harris explained that Meyer and now Prudential have come in with an overall concept for their pro- perties. He then asked about the uses proposed for the Meyer property to the south and the traffic generation of both. He asked if the traffic generation of the proposed five-story office building would be morning and late afternoons and whether or not this had been addressed in the traffic studies. Mr. Harris said the initial plans are for 924 trips inbound, 978 outbound and the new plan is for 298 inbound and 1198 outbound. Commissioner Lindsey asked if the improvements on Johnson Drive would be able to handle the proposal. Mr. Harris explained the report of TJKM and their recommendations. Commissioner Wilson asked about condition number 8 in case PUD-80-14 and if development would be withheld if traffic resulted in Level "E". Mr. Swift said that the thing that would be done first as pointed out by Commissioner Wilson if Reynolds and Brown are 80~ complete and traffic on the road was reaching Level "E", this condition would require that mitigation measures be taken immediately to ensure the intersection does not reach that level. Chairperson Getty asked what would happen if Reynolds and Brown goes first and Meyer doesn't build because of traffic. Mr. Swift explained. He indicated that the Reynolds and Brown traffic analysis assumed Stoneridge Drive interchange would be in place or that traffic could travel south through the Meyer development rather than Hopyard to Johnson. Chairperson Getty indicated she had a problem with one road in and out. Commissioner Wilson indicated he thought perhaps this application is to prevent the developer from losing sewer permits to Dublin. Commissioner Jamieson asked about the gross square footage of coverage vs the net square footage of coverage if a precedent would be set in approving this for Reynolds and Brown. Mr. Harris indicated he supposed that somebody else could attempt to get the same thing. Further, Prudential has drawn the property line differently in that they are showing the property line at the back of the curb whereas, the street right-of-way will extend 10-15 behind the curb and that the City doesn't know what the Meyer people will be proposing. He said they have not come in with any specific building site plans to calculate their 35~. Commissioner Jamieson asked about the driveway proposed for the south side of the motel. Mr. Harris showed the Planning Commission the location of the proposed driveway. The public hearing was opened. -10-