My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 03/31/82
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1982
>
PC 03/31/82
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 4:27:33 PM
Creation date
4/30/2007 2:21:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/31/1982
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 03/31/82
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
DISCUSSIG. r' FRONT YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENTS (Oral r rt) <br />Mr. Harris stated that in looking at the Craney request for a <br />variance in the Ordinance Code, staff came to the conclusion <br />that a variance is not needed if their interpretation of certain <br />sections of the Code are correct. He said the staff desires to <br />bring this matter to the attention of Planning Commission because <br />it may be foreign to the Commission. He said the ordinance has <br />been amended a couple of different times regarding the front yard <br />setback in the R-1 Districts. He said each amendment had to do <br />with the minimum setbacks for garages which are entered perpendi- <br />cular to the street. He said there was a 20 ft. to 23 ft. change. <br />He said he believes it was assumed it also applied to the living <br />portion of the residents. He further stated that prior to 1971 <br />the Commission would see that the front yard was listed at 15 ft. <br />He said a swing in type garage does require 15 ft. He said it is <br />the staff's interpretation of the Code that only a garage entered <br />perpendicularly to the street has to be 23 ft. from the front <br />property line and all other portions of the structure need have <br />only a 15 ft. front setback. He said that if the Commission concurs <br />with this interpretation of the Code, Craney would be able to build <br />his addition without a variance. <br />Commissioner Linsey asked if there are any other homes in the area <br />under the same circumstances. <br />Mr. Harris said there are four to six houses with similar circum- <br />stances. <br />Chairperson Getty indicated she has no problem with staff's <br />interpretation of the Code. Mr. Harris pointed out that it means <br />subdivisions can be built under these same circumstances. The <br />Planning Commission indicated they concurred with the interpretation <br />of the ordinance code as presented by staff. <br />TENTATIVE MAPS <br />There were none. <br />COMMUNICATIONS <br />There were none. <br />REFERRALS <br />There were none. <br />MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S INFORMATION <br />Commissioner Jamieson indicated he would like a list of the projects <br />approved but undeveloped in Pleasanton as it relates to commercial <br />and industrial uses. <br />CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS <br />Mr. Harris presented the City Council actions with regard to their <br />last meeting. <br />ADJOURNMENT <br />There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at <br />12:07 a.m. by Chairperson Joyce Getty. <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />~~, = v~-lj <br />Rober ~: Harris, <br />Secretary <br />-19- <br />....r.__._. ___ ... <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.