Laserfiche WebLink
for the area. He further said he didn't like the section of the <br />proposed HPD where it speaks to 'staff waiving anything'. He <br />suggested this area be struck. <br />This matter was then continued to April 14, 1982. <br />PUD-82-4, City of Pleasanton <br />Application of the City of Pleasanton to rezone three parcels of <br />land (Parcels A, B and C, Parcel Map 2566) totalling approximately <br />16.7 acres from the I-G (General Industrial) District to the P.U.D. <br />(Planned Unit Development) General and Limited Industrial District. <br />These parcels are located as follows: <br />10.6 acres immediately south of the Clorox research <br />facility on Johnson Drive, <br />excluding the southeast approximately 2.75 acre <br />portion; <br />5.6 acres between Johnson Drive & Stoneridge Drive <br />east of I-680; and <br />3.2 acres south of Stoneridge Drive, east of I-680 <br />just north of the wastewater treatment facility of <br />the Dublin San Ramon Services District. <br />The Planning Commission may recommend any action concerning the <br />subject property consistent with the General Plan. A negative <br />declaration of environmental impacts will also be considered. <br />Mr. Harris presented the staff report. <br />The public hearing was opened. <br />Ken Scheidig, 2340 Tice Valley Way, Walnut Creek, addressed the <br />Commission on behalf of Vorelco. He asked that the 2.57 acres <br />for Dillingham be eliminated from this and stated they concur <br />with the staff report in this regard. <br />The public hearing was closed. <br />A motion was made that the negative declaration prepared for <br />case PUD-82-4 be recommended for adoption inasmuch as approval <br />of this rezoning would have no adverse significant effect on the <br />environment. This motion was made by Commissioner Wilson, seconded <br />by Commissioner Doherty. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />AYES: Commissioners Doherty, Jamieson, Lindsey, Wilson and <br />Chairperson Getty <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br />Resolution No. 2160 was then entered and adopted recommending <br />approval of the negative declaration for this case. <br />-17- <br />__..__..__ _._....._~ .._.__.___.. _... __._._.._.. __. _ _.. _._ .............. ., _ _.._.._, , _..__. _._ _ _ _____.__ _ r <br />