My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 03/31/82
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1982
>
PC 03/31/82
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 4:27:33 PM
Creation date
4/30/2007 2:21:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/31/1982
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 03/31/82
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
operate a savings and loan facility in an existing structure at <br />530 Main Street. Zoning for the property is C-C (Central Com- <br />mercial) District. <br />Mr. Harris presented the staff report. <br />The public hearing was opened. <br />Chris Beratlis was in the audience representing the applicant but <br />indicated they had no comments. <br />The public hearing was closed. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Wilson, seconded by Commissioner <br />Jamieson that the findings shown in the staff report are made and <br />that case UP-82-3 be approved per the conditions of the staff <br />report. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />AYES: Commissioners Doherty, Jamieson, Lindsey, Wilson and <br />Chairperson Getty <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br />Resolution No. 2157 was then entered and adopted approving case <br />UP-8-3 as motioned. <br />PUD-82-8, E. J. Parish Organization <br />Application of Richard and Ursula Ultsch and Theodore Bates for <br />prezoning and development plan approval for an approximately <br />247 dwelling unit project on an approximately 29 acre site <br />located on the north side of Vineyard Avenue opposite Sauterne <br />Way. The property is currently prezoned P.U.D. (Planned Unit. <br />Development) Medium Density Residential District with certain <br />conditions governing its development. The Planning Commission <br />may recommend approval of the new prezoning and the proposed <br />development plan or make any other recommendations regarding <br />the subject property consistent with the General Plan. A <br />negative declaration of environmental impacts was also considered. <br />Mr. Harris explained the staff report and the differences in the <br />current proposal and that previously considered. In answer to a <br />question posed of Chairperson Getty, Mr. Harris stated that no <br />attempt was made to eliminate children from any area of the <br />development. He stated that the City felt, however, that persons <br />50 and over would probably generate less traffic than young <br />families with children. <br />Commissioner Wilson addressed the setbacks of driveways and <br />structures. Chairperson Getty asked if when there was a 23 ft. <br />setback there would be an automatic garage opener. Mr. Harris <br />responded that standard size automobiles wouldn't hang over the <br />sidewalk while opening the door. Mr. Harris further stated that <br />the dwellings reserved for age 50 and over would not have auto- <br />matic door openers because the setbacks are sufficient. <br />-10- <br />_ .._.___. . _ ._....__._._.___._..._..__ ____..._.__._ _ _ ,. __ ____-~-_,_... . _ _.. .. _ .. __... _ _.___.~ .._____ .... _..... _ ._ ..._ _ ... .....r. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.