PC 03/31/82 - Laserfiche WebLink

operate a savings and loan facility in an existing structure at 530 Main Street. Zoning for the property is C-C (Central Com- mercial) District. Mr. Harris presented the staff report. The public hearing was opened. Chris Beratlis was in the audience representing the applicant but indicated they had no comments. The public hearing was closed. A motion was made by Commissioner Wilson, seconded by Commissioner Jamieson that the findings shown in the staff report are made and that case UP-82-3 be approved per the conditions of the staff report. ROLL CALL VOTE AYES: Commissioners Doherty, Jamieson, Lindsey, Wilson and Chairperson Getty NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Resolution No. 2157 was then entered and adopted approving case UP-8-3 as motioned. PUD-82-8, E. J. Parish Organization Application of Richard and Ursula Ultsch and Theodore Bates for prezoning and development plan approval for an approximately 247 dwelling unit project on an approximately 29 acre site located on the north side of Vineyard Avenue opposite Sauterne Way. The property is currently prezoned P.U.D. (Planned Unit. Development) Medium Density Residential District with certain conditions governing its development. The Planning Commission may recommend approval of the new prezoning and the proposed development plan or make any other recommendations regarding the subject property consistent with the General Plan. A negative declaration of environmental impacts was also considered. Mr. Harris explained the staff report and the differences in the current proposal and that previously considered. In answer to a question posed of Chairperson Getty, Mr. Harris stated that no attempt was made to eliminate children from any area of the development. He stated that the City felt, however, that persons 50 and over would probably generate less traffic than young families with children. Commissioner Wilson addressed the setbacks of driveways and structures. Chairperson Getty asked if when there was a 23 ft. setback there would be an automatic garage opener. Mr. Harris responded that standard size automobiles wouldn't hang over the sidewalk while opening the door. Mr. Harris further stated that the dwellings reserved for age 50 and over would not have auto- matic door openers because the setbacks are sufficient. -10- _ .._.___. . _ ._....__._._.___._..._..__ ____..._.__._ _ _ ,. __ ____-~-_,_... . _ _.. .. _ .. __... _ _.___.~ .._____ .... _..... _ ._ ..._ _ ... .....r.