PC 04/14/82 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Dunkley rebutted stating that a PUD requires soils reports, elevations of buildings, etc. He said this is burdensome inasmuch as the project will not be totally developed for several years. Mr. Harris confirmed that indeed a PUD application must be supported by site plans, conceptual elevations typical of buildings to be proposed, landscape plan, parking plan and a preliminary grading plan for the entire area. He said you would not have to have specific elevations for the houses. He said typical elevations could be used. He explained that Mike Harris had to furnish this for his PUD on Vineyard Avenue and the 16 units on Santa Rita Road as do all PUD developers. Commissioner Wilson questioned that an overall PUD would require $50,000. Commissioner Wilson further said that Morrison Homes also had to have an approved development plan. He spoke to many concessions being made for Morrison (Valley at Santa Rita) and mentioned that they have been in many times to change the property to Commercial which would also remove the proposed park with everyone forgetting the concessions made by the City to approve the PUD initially. Mr. Harris stated that there is no way staff can recommend 15 units/ acre with no idea of the quality of development proposed for phases A, B and C. He said it is a reasonable request that the applicant come in with an overall PUD application. Commissioner Doherty felt that in changing the General Plan land use designation would be 'opening pandora's box' and could not support the change. He then made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Lindsey to deny case GP-82-5. At that point staff suggested that action be taken on the negative declaration prior to a vote inas- much as any action would be a recommendation to City Council and not the final decision. Commissioners Doherty and Lindsey then rescinded their motion and second. Commissioner Lindsey stated that the project looks like a good one but would like a plan for the entire 57 acres. A motion was then made by Commissioner Lindsey, seconded by Commissioner Jamieson that the negative declaration prepared for this project be recommended for adoption inasmuch as the proposed land use change would have no adverse significant effect on the environment. ROLL CALL VOTE Ayes: Commissioners Doherty, Jamieson, Lindsey and Chairperson Getty Noes: Commissioner Wilson Absent: None Abstain: None -9- __.~. .__.___._.V _.. ~... ,... _.~___.. ,..... __.____._ ..__,_... _.__. _.. ._ _-____._ ...r.._ ..