My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 04/14/82
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1982
>
PC 04/14/82
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 4:27:28 PM
Creation date
4/30/2007 2:20:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/14/1982
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 04/14/82
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Lindsey then made a motion, seconded by Commissioner <br />Wilson to initiate an application to rezone the 200 block of Main <br />Street from "O" (Office) District to the C-C (Central Commercial) <br />District. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />Ayes: Commissioners Doherty, Jamieson, Lindsey, Wilson and <br />Chairperson Getty <br />Noes: None <br />Absent: None <br />Abstain: None <br />Resolution No. 2163 was then entered and adopted initiating a <br />rezoning application as motioned. <br />Chairperson Getty stated that at recent downtown meetings held for <br />the state of California as well as at previous meetings consisting <br />of other cities, it has come to her attention that most cities <br />have a Design Review Board made up of people other than Planning <br />Commissioners. She said a typical Design Review Board would have <br />one architect, one landscape architect, a member of a homeowners' <br />association, one business person and perhaps two planning com- <br />missioners and perhaps this structure should be considered by <br />Pleasanton so that the Design Review Board would have the expertise <br />required to look at the aesthetics of various proposals presented. <br />She stated this would also reduce the workload of the Planning <br />Commission. She said this Board could even meet during the day. <br />She asked her fellow Commissioners to think about this. <br />Mr. Harris stated that the Design Review Board structure is set <br />out in ordinance so the City Council would have to change the <br />ordinance with this regard if it is the Planning Commission's <br />desire to do so. <br />Commissioner Jamieson said that based on experience, and while not <br />objecting to redesignating the Board, the Pleasanton Design Review <br />Board has done a pretty good job when you compare Pleasanton to <br />surrounding cities. He further stated to his knowledge, there <br />are only three architects in town and it seemed to him that in <br />such a small place, the City's architects would perhaps run into <br />a conflict of interest. He said he would look to experience and <br />results generated from the actions of the Design Review Board for <br />Pleasanton. <br />Commissioner Jamieson further stated he believes one should look <br />at Pleasanton vs. Livermore or other surrounding areas for results. <br />-2- <br />_..,_ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.