My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 08/11/82
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1982
>
PC 08/11/82
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 4:26:27 PM
Creation date
4/30/2007 2:00:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/11/1982
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 08/11/82
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 13 <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Doherty, seconded by Commissioner <br />Getty that the Planning Commission of the City of Pleasanton certifies <br />that the Environmental Impact Report for the project PUD-82-13 has <br />been completed in compliance with the provisions of the California <br />Environmental Quality Act, that the Commission certifies that it has <br />reviewed and considered the information in the EIR, that the Commission <br />finds that there are potentially significant impacts associated with <br />this project as outlined in the document titled "Proposed Environmental <br />Impact Findings" relating to aesthetics, soils, geology and fire pro- <br />tection; but that the Commission further finds that the recommended <br />conditions of approval would reduce those impacts to an insignificant <br />level. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />Ayes: Commissioners Doherty, Getty, Jamieson and Chairperson Lindsey <br />Noes: None <br />Abstain: Commissioner Wilson <br />Absent: None <br />Resolution No. 2208 was then entered and adopted recommending approval <br />of the EIR for case PUD-82-13 as motioned. <br />Commissioner Doherty made a motion seconded by Commissioner Getty that <br />the following findings can be made with regard to the objectives of <br />the PUD ordinance as they are reflected in case PUD-82-13: <br />Exclude growth from those areas not well suited to urban development <br />and protect the residents of Pleasanton from undue risks to life and <br />property - construction will be in areas of less than 25~ slope; two <br />separate geologic studies have been done which indicate that all <br />building sites proposed are acceptable from a geologic hazards stand- <br />point; and property not in a floodway or flood plain. <br />Preserve those natural resources, whether animal, vegetable or mineral <br />which are important to the physical, cultural, social and economic well <br />being of the community - abundant natural open space being preserved as <br />part of the development; and all development proposed will be unobtrusive <br />due to controls on road locations, building heights, colors and materials, <br />treatment of landscaped areas, and preservation of heritage size trees. <br />Protect the lives and property of all residents, property owners or <br />other persons associated with the community, from hazards due to fire - <br />numerous conditions relating to access for fire fighting equipment, <br />types of building materials to be used, types of plants to be intro- <br />duced, amounts of fire flow required, size and type of fire suppression <br />facilities to be installed, etc. are recommended. <br />Mitigate hazards that may result from geologic activity, such as <br />landslides - two geologic reports have been prepared which indicate <br />that development of the proposed building pads would be safe if <br />certain building and engineering practices are followed; a recommended <br />condition of approval is that all recommendations of these two reports <br />shall be followed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.