My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 09/21/82
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1982
>
PC 09/21/82
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 4:26:02 PM
Creation date
4/30/2007 1:55:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/21/1982
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 09/21/82
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Pl nning Commission <br />Mi utes <br />Pa e 9 <br />Mr. Bras again urged the <br />re ove the slats in the f~ <br />th company vehicle yard <br />wo k out the details. Coy <br />wi h this request. Mr. H. <br />he would like to see fur t: <br />in icated that where they <br />wo ld be matching that of <br />VOTE <br />Commissioners <br />Chairperson Li <br />None <br />Commissioner G <br />None <br />A otion was made by Commissioner Wilson, seconded by Commissioner <br />Ja ieson, recommending ap roval of the Negative Declaration prepared <br />fo case PUD-82-19 becaus approval of the project would have no <br />si nificant adverse effec on the environment. <br />RO L CALL <br />Ay s: <br />No s: <br />Ab ent: <br />Ab taint <br />lanning Commission to allow the applicant to <br />nce between the employees' parking lot and <br />nd leave it up to the staff and applicant to <br />missioner Jamieson said he had no problem <br />rris said that until the trees are grown <br />er screening through use of slats. Mr. Bras <br />would be stopping the chain link fence it <br />Dillingham. <br />herty, Jamieson, Wilson and <br />sey <br />ty <br />Re olution No. 2221 was t en entered and adopted recommending approval <br />of the Negative Declarati n prepared for case PUD-82-19 as motioned. <br />A n <br />Jan <br />in <br />otion was made by Commissioner Doherty, seconded by Commissioner <br />ieson that case PUD-82 19 be recommended for approval as suggested <br />the staff report amend'ng Condition No. 3 to read as follows: <br />"That landscaping any <br />as shown in the prel <br />file with the Planni: <br />plan shall be submit <br />prior to issuance of <br />of plants and widths <br />final plan." <br />RO L • <br />Av s• <br />No s: <br />Absent: <br />Abstain: <br />CALL VOTE <br />fence location shall be substantially <br />'urinary landscape plan, Exhibit B, on <br />.g Division; that a final overall landscape <br />ed to the Planning Division for approval <br />a building permit and that the number <br />of planters may be increased in the <br />Commissioners D herty, Jamieson, Wilson and <br />Chairperson Lin sey <br />None <br />Commissioner Ge ty <br />None <br />Resolution No. 2222 was t en entered and adopted recommending approval <br />of case PUD-82-19 as moti ned. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.