Laserfiche WebLink
Pl <br />Pa <br />ning Commission <br />tes <br />8 <br />Resolution No. 2220 was <br />of case PUD-82-18 as mot <br />PUD-82-19, Pacific Teleph <br />Application o Paci is Te <br />"field operating center" <br />ma ely 13,600 sq. ft. and <br />si located just south o <br />is UD (Planned Unit Deve <br />ne ative declaration of e <br />en entered and adopted recommended approval <br />ned. <br />ne <br />ephone for development plan approval of a <br />onsisting of three structures totalling approxi- <br />related facilities on an approximately 5.5 acre <br />7200 Johnson Drive. Zoning for the property <br />opment) General Industrial District. A <br />vironmental impacts was also considered. <br />Mr.~ Harris presented the staff report recommending approval. <br />Th <br />J. <br />th <br />pe <br />in <br />He <br />mi <br />ad <br />th <br />be <br />em <br />vi <br />pr <br />Co <br />sc <br />Ha <br />ex <br />sh <br />fi <br />Co <br />wo <br />bu <br />re <br />sh <br />Ch <br />th <br />fo <br />pl <br />public hearing was <br />ack Bras, 90 Mission rive, represented the applicant. He indicated <br />this is not a specul tion facility but one required to serve the <br />le in the area and th t the site was selected as a result of an <br />nse site search. He ddressed conditions number one, three and four. <br />resented a new Exhibi B, Preliminary Landscape Plan, to the Com- <br />ion and staff and ask d that it be reviewed for consideration to <br />ess conditions one, t ree and four. He reviewed the intention of <br />preliminary landscape plan furnished. He asked that Condition No. 4 <br />liminated or at least changed to eliminate the fence between the <br />oyees' parking lot an the company vehicle lot so they can be <br />ble. Commissioner Ja ieson asked Mr. Bras .the types of vehicles <br />osed to be put on thi property. Mr. Bras explained. <br />issioner Doherty aske if the new Exhibit B presented for land- <br />ing is all right with staff if Condition No. 4 is left in. Mr. <br />is said they have no roblem with moving fences back but that the <br />t placement of trees nd shrubs and what portions of the fence <br />ld have redwood slats should be further discussed and that the <br />1 landscape plan migh be required to show more trees. Concerning <br />ition No. 3, Mr. Harris reported that a final landscape plan <br />d have to be submitte to the staff prior to the issuance of <br />ding permits with the understanding that the developer may be <br />fired to provide more ense landscaping than is currently being <br />n. <br />rperson Lindsey, Com <br />removal of slats on <br />security reasons. T <br />ted, with Commission <br />ssioner Jamieson and Mr. Harris then discussed <br />e western portion of the proposed fence <br />y also discussed the size of the trees to be <br />Jamieson addressing 15 gallon trees. <br />