PC 09/21/82 - Laserfiche WebLink

Pl nning Commission Mi utes Pa e 4 Co issioner Doherty then suggested that the Hempys be allowed to look at the letter. A copy was then given to them for their review. He th n asked if staff had a problem in continuing the matter to the ne t meeting as requested of the Williams. Mr Warnick indicated that he had given a copy of the letter to his st ff who would like a little more time to look at the matter in de ail. Th~ public hearing was opened. Ri hard Hempy, 201 Spring Street, indicated that in October 1981 the Wi liams also sent a letter to the Planning Commission stating the same th'ngs as the letter received September 21, 1982. He said their major co cern was with the possible development of the rear of the property. He said they were also worried about a road going to their home. He sa'd he could see no reason to continue the application because the ro d will be widened to almost 20 ft. and he couldn't see this to be a roblem. Chairperson Lindsey asked if there was a dirt road now. Mr. Hempy said it is a dirt road. Co issioner Jamieson inquired as to whether or not the Williams ha an easement through the Hempy land. Mr. Hempy said they did. Ch irperson Lindsey felt that it would benefit the applicants to put th matter off to the 13th of October and by that time there would pr bably be some figures available as to what improvements would be re uired. Co issioner Wilson asked if the earthquake faults were discovered as a result of the trenching. Mr. Hempy confirmed this to be the case. Mr. Hempy further stated that the Williams live up on the hill and everything the applicant would be doing would benefit them. He said that perhaps if PUD zoning were explained to the Williams, they might be ore understanding of the proposal. of di Gil No. the in pro He the Lrperson Lindsey asked Mr. Hempy if he had any problems with any .he conditions as recom¢nended by staff. Mr. Hempy replied, "he not." Barbee, Land Surveyor, 147 Bernal Avenue, spoke to Condition 22. He said Mr. Hempy should understand that the Hempys reserved right to purchase the southern one-half to a deadline established :he sale of the property, but did not have the right to dedicate ~erty for Foothill Road or any easement which the Starnes own. >aid they have no right to the northern one-half which will remain Starnes.