My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 02/04/76
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1970-1979
>
1976
>
PC 02/04/76
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/31/2017 4:17:22 PM
Creation date
4/30/2007 1:37:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/4/1976
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 02/04/76
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
41'$ ~ <br />~$""r° CITY of PLEASANTC~-N <br />\ ' •~/ <br />~~~° Planning Commissi©n <br />.~..o <br />MINUTES ~OF REGULAR MEETING. <br />Data February 4, 1976 <br />Time : 8 : oo P .M. <br />PIGCe; Pleasanton Justice .Court <br />tailment of air space as it affects <br />the City of Pleasanton is adopted, <br />he would work up something to sub- <br />stantiate that position. Commissione,' <br />Garrigan mirrored the Chairman's <br />feelings on this matter. <br />',Mr. Harris drew the Commission's at- <br />jtention to a map prepared by staff <br />(showing both the flood hazard areas <br />Wand those areas within the geologic <br />hazard zones. <br />The Chairman advised the audience <br />that all specific development plans <br />are reviewed by the Design Review <br />Board. <br />Commissioner Garrigan requested that <br />the minutes of this hearing be trans- <br />mitted to the Council at the time <br />they review the General Plan in order <br />that they may have a more comprehen- <br />sive idea of the Commission's thought <br />and especially the concerns of the <br />people in the audience who expressed <br />themselves at the Commission meeting. <br />A resolution recommending approval of <br />the Plan was then read by Mr. Levine. <br />Commissioner Butler referred to Sec- <br />tion 2 dealing with the environmental <br />element and its effects on the plan <br />and specific mitigation measures, tha <br />it is important to point out that <br />although the Planning Commission dis- <br />cussion has not dwelled on this in <br />great length, that the Commission has <br />reviewed this question and agrees wit <br />the findings noted in said section. <br />Accordingly, Resolution No. 1392, re <br />commending approval of the General <br />Plan, was unanimously adopted. <br />-11- <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.