Laserfiche WebLink
4y~~8~~~°y CITY of PLEASANTCJN <br />~~~. <br />~~° Planning Cor~nrriission <br />`. NY f9 <br />MINUTES ~OF REGULAR MEETING. <br />DGte : March 10, 1976 <br />Time: 8:0o P.M. <br />PIGCe: Pleasanton Justice Court <br />Chairman Wood's recollection of the <br />situation was that at the time this <br />PUD was considered, it was a new <br />concept consequently the Commission <br />had little experience with this type <br />of development. They did, however, <br />feel the idea was workable. <br />Commissioner Shepherd suggested a <br />compromise solution, such as a more <br />attractive fence,-and good buffering <br />of the yard from the homes. <br />One matter of real concern to the <br />Commissioners was the possibility <br />of dumping of sewage into the storm <br />drains by people parking their motor <br />homes in the lot, etc. <br />Commissioner Carrigan felt that no <br />real decision could be made at this <br />time, because, since RZ-76-2 was <br />turned down the developer had the <br />option of appeal. Both homeowners <br />groups would need to be considered. <br />The other Commissioners concurred <br />with this position. <br />Since the Commissioners felt it was <br />important that a reasonable compro- <br />mise solution be established for <br />all concerned, they decided not to <br />act on this matter at this time. <br />Instead, they decided .that an ad hoc <br />committee should be established to <br />thrash out all the details and pre- <br />sent them to the Commission, if <br />necessary at a special meeting, with <br />some recommendations for an amicable <br />solution. This committee would be <br />comprised of one member only from <br />City staff, Planning Commission <br />(Walt Wood offered to serve), Stone- <br />son Company, single family homeowner; <br />-12- <br />