Laserfiche WebLink
CITY of PLEASANTON <br />a Planning Commission <br />MINUTES ~OF REGULAR MEETING. <br />DGte ; April 14, 1976 <br />Time : 8 ~ 53 P.M. <br />PIOCe; Pleasanton Council Chambers <br />courts. However, the City can pro- <br />tect itself by making it clear in <br />the staff report and as a condition <br />to the rezoning that sewer connection; <br />are not presently available nor are <br />they likely to be available in the <br />near future. <br />Mr. Di Manto asked that he be given <br />the opportunity to rebut Messrs. <br />Pearson's and Savery's remarks, <br />after questions from Commission and <br />staff. <br />The Public Hearing was then closed. <br />Secretary Harris explained the <br />differences between the I-P and <br />L-I zoning designations. He ex- <br />plained that the developers request <br />of Limited Industrial is not a <br />zoning district but a GP designation <br />and that it was always the staff's <br />preference that the 162 acre area <br />be rezoned I-P (Industrial Park). <br />Extensive discussion ensued between <br />staff and Commission members re- <br />garding traffic circulation, noise <br />mitigation measures the applicant <br />would need to meet, and the various <br />methods in whic:.z this could be <br />achieved. Another important factor <br />was possible flooding of the area, <br />and how design of the flood control <br />facilities can resolve these pro- <br />blems. <br />Regarding the determination of making <br />a finding that the EIR has been com- <br />pleted in compliance with CEQA and <br />State Guidelines, etc., a resolution <br />was entered and adopted making such <br />a finding. <br />-4- <br />