Laserfiche WebLink
V$~-SA~r?O <br />y <br />CITY ®f <br />PLEASANTO~~N <br />,~ <br />~~° <br />Planning <br />Commission <br />.o <br />~~ <br />~~ <br /> ~ <br />MINUTES OF REGULAR MEET ING. ~'~ ~~~~ <br />DGt9 : September 8, 1976 <br />Time : 8:45 P.M. <br />PIOCe; Pleasanton Council Chambers <br />MATTERS FOR <br />COMMISSION'S <br />REVIEW <br />MS-76-11, Approved <br />Res. 1450. <br />who would want to build a three-car <br />garage driveway. <br />It was also clarified that should a <br />person be turned down by the Super- <br />intendent of Streets to build a <br />second driveway, the recourse of <br />appeal would be the same as presently <br />exists, namely, to the City Council. <br />The Public Hearing was opened and <br />closed. <br />A resolution recommending to the <br />City Council the adoption of this <br />ordinance amendment, was entered and <br />adopted. <br />Jim Balch - application for a minor <br />subdivision of a 2.37 acre parcel <br />located at 255 Kottinger Drive. <br />Zoning for the property is R-1-6500 <br />!District. <br />The staff report was reviewed by the <br />Commissioners and Secretary Harris. <br />It was clarified that the entire <br />property, when subdivided, would <br />contain only three units. <br />Further discussion ensued regarding <br />access for the lots from Pine Hill <br />Lane. <br />Mr. Balch, applicant, indicated he <br />had read the staff report. Ori- <br />ginally, he had contemplated using <br />Pine Hill Lane as access for two <br />lots. He described the improve- <br />ments which currently exist at the <br />lower end of Pine Hill Lane. <br />t this time, Mr. Balch has no <br />lans for development of the lots. <br />ventually, he intends to utilize <br />Resolution <br />Seconded: <br />Ayes: <br />Noes: <br />Absent: <br />Abstain: <br />I~ <br />X <br />I~ <br />-9- <br />