My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 11/03/76
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1970-1979
>
1976
>
PC 11/03/76
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/31/2017 4:15:29 PM
Creation date
4/30/2007 1:18:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/3/1976
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 11/03/76
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Boulevard in front of their property. Also, he would not object to <br />participating in street improvements for Sunol Boulevard if and when the <br />entire side of the street is improved. He would not want to be singled <br />out at this time. <br />Chairman Butler indicated that he would have a problem discussing almost <br />any kind of traffic control that is not tied to street improvements out <br />there. Commissioner Wood suggested some low landscaping for better cir- <br />culation in and out of the property. Commissioner Jamieson felt the <br />applicant should be given an opportunity to work out a traffic pattern <br />with the staff and return to the Planning Commission the following meeting. <br />It was decided to continue this item to the November 10, 1976, allowing <br />the applicant to work with the City staff in developing a feasible traffic <br />circulation plan for ingress/egress to the proposed site. <br />MATTERS FOR ITJFORMATION OF COMMISSION <br />Secretary Harris described briefly the minor changes to the planned unit <br />development ordinance which they had reviewed and recommended to City <br />Council at a prior meeting. The Commissioners concurred with the modifi- <br />cations. <br />Secretary Harris then stated that the Council had continued to their next <br />meeting the goals and objectives of the Growth Management Plan. To date, <br />no comments have been received from any members. This matter has been <br />rescheduled for a special meeting on November 15. Mr. Brandes indicated <br />that he hoped to see active participation of the Commission members. It <br />appeared that several meetings would be required to resolve this issue. <br />Secretary Harris brought up the issue of a letter written by the City <br />Attorney regarding foreclosure proceedings against certain properties, <br />mostly on the Ridge, for delinquent bonds. Mr. Scheidig is asking for <br />some guidance as to whether or not foreclosure action should be instituted. <br />Mr. Sooby stated that his office is preparing a map which will show where <br />the properties are. Mr. Harris stated that his department will be looking <br />at the properties from a planning viewpoint. Generally, a lot of the land <br />is shown on the General Plan as open space. Chairman Butler felt that, <br />after the department analyzes a policy on this matter, the Commission could <br />look at the staff recommendations. <br />Deputy City Attorney then presented information previously requested by <br />Commissioner Jamieson, regarding what kinds of actions would require reso- <br />lutions, what actions would require motions, etc., and the findings which <br />need to be made for variances, as opposed to conditional uses, etc. <br />MATTERS INITIATED BY COMMISSIOI`d MEMBERS <br />Commissioner Wood indicated that he had received notification for an up- <br />coming planning seminar. <br />-5- <br />__._...__.__._._... __.~__ _. ...._... _. _ ......_..._..,..___ ~ ...,.. ~ _. ......_ _ LL. _ . „ _.._ ..,.. _ . ..... .. _ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.