My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 09/14/77
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1970-1979
>
1977
>
PC 09/14/77
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/31/2017 4:19:26 PM
Creation date
4/30/2007 11:48:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/14/1977
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 09/14/77
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The Public Hearing was opened on the planned unit development review. <br />Mr. Datwyler spoke indicating he could see no major problem with re- <br />location of certain of the units as proposed in the staff report. <br />The comments expressed by Mr. Singleton earlier in the proceedings <br />were also considered here . <br />The Public Hearing was closed on the PUD hearing. <br />Resolution 1564 was entered and adopted recommending to the City Council <br />the adoption of PUD-77-6, subject to all conditions in the staff report. <br />The comments expressed by Mr. Singleton earlier in the proceedings were <br />also considered here. <br />The Public Hearing was closed on the PUD hearing. <br />Resolution 1564 was entered and adopted recommending to the City Council <br />the adoption of PUD-77-6, subject to all conditions in the staff report. <br />Roll Call Vote <br />Resolution: Wood <br />Seconded: Doherty <br />Ayes: Doherty, Jamieson, Shepherd, Wood, Chairman Butler <br />Noes: None <br />Absent: None <br />Abstain: None <br />MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S REVIEW <br />Review of request for annexation of 13.6 acres of land on Stanley Boule- <br />vard, owned by Joseph Madden. <br />1Kr. Don Sooby, Director of Engineering Services, presented the staff <br />report. He also presented a map showing an aerial view of the vicinity. <br />In evaluating the annexation request, Mr. Sooby concluded that Alter- <br />native A should be pursued as it appeared to be the most logical of <br />the three alternatives in dealing with the area. <br />However, most of the homeowners in the area objected to being annexed <br />to the City and presented a petition requesting that an EIR be prepared. <br />Considerable discussion ensued between staff and the Commissioners re- <br />garding pros and cons of this action. <br />The processes to be followed in annexing the property through LAFCO <br />were explained. Secretary Harris stated that an environmental impact <br />report would be prepared, probably at the prezoning stage, either by <br />the City or LAFCO. Regarding the restricted growth policy, it would <br />still be in effect until the Residential Allocation Program is in <br />operation. The first part of the restricted growth policy instructs <br />the Planning Commission to defer consideration of all annexations ex- <br />cept for those properties not requiring a significant number of sewer <br />connections. Secretary Harris pointed out an advantage of having the <br />land in the City, because as Commercial Service zoned property, and <br />-9- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.