PC 09/14/77 - Laserfiche WebLink

Roll Call Vote Resolution: Wood Seconded: Doherty Ayes: Doherty, Jamieson, Wood, Chairman Butler Noes: None Absent: None Abstain: Shepherd Commissioner Shepherd abstained from the vote as he joined the meeting in the middle of the discussion. REVISIONS AND OMISSIONS TO THE AGENDA Item 6d, PUD-77-7, Robert J. Myers, was continued to the October 12, 1977 meeting until the matter of the appeal regarding staff determination for the filing of an environmental impact report can be resolved by the City Council. OLD BUSINESS GP-77-3 and RZ-77-10, Pleasanton Residential Allocation Program Application by the City of Pleasanton to adopt a "Community Development Element" to the General Plan of the City of Pleasanton containing the goals and policies of the City of Pleasanton related to new development with particular emphasis on new residential development and to adopt an implementing "Residential Allocation Ordinance" setting forth the criteria governing future residential development in Pleasanton. City Attorney Ken Scheidig explained the necessary findings the Commission would need to make at the environmental assessment review. He briefly discussed the 1972 settlement agreement, described the area in question which would be affected, and how the sewer permits would meld the 1972 agreement with the provisions of the Residential Allocation Program. Commissioner Jamieson asked Mr. Scheidig what effect this would have on the Sunol plant when it is phased out, and Mr. Scheidig replied there would be no effect. Chairman Butler wished to know whether those districts be maintained only as long as the agreement is in effect and Mr. Scheidig replied that eventually it would become a Citywide system, but not until after the 1972 settlement agreement is completed. Commissioner Shepherd wished to know whether all final tract maps were included on that agree- ment. The City Attorney indicated that basically all of them were included. He then proceeded to explain all the features of the ordinance. Commissioner Wood asked if it would be possible that the 1972 agreement be taken care of under the point system, so that those developers would be competing Citywide, and they could qualify and become involved in the rest of the Plan. Mr. Scheidig indicated they will be participating in the entire plan in the VCSD area. He then explained the ramifications of the VCSD 1972 agreement and the City's need to protect the area served by the Sunol plant, which would eventually be phased out into the VCSD plant. The entire program includes mandatory and incentive elements. He explained that all final maps on the 1972 agreement are valid, and all tentative maps are invalid due to passage of time. The City Attorney wished to clear up one point immediately, and that is the allocations are set up by priority schedule established by the 1972 Agreement. In the VCSD area, all appli- cants compete against each other on a priority list. In the Sunol area, the applicants compete against themselves, and there is no priority list. -2- _ ._ ._ __ .._~.~..~..____ _._._.__._~_ _.._.._....__~ _ _ _.____.r~._.__ ____.._. __ ______._ .._._._.~._.__.~____..__.__..~ .._._.. _ _._ ..._ . _ _ ..._.. __.