Laserfiche WebLink
Another motion was entered and adopted deleting 5. and taking those <br />15 points and reallocating them between 1. and 2., as to retain relative <br />position of the points. If there was one point remaining, it should be <br />added to 3. "In-filling" Area. <br />Roll Call Vote <br />Motion: Shepherd <br />Seconded: Butler <br />Ayes: Shepherd, Wood and Chairman Butler <br />Noes: None <br />Absent: None <br />Abstain: Doherty, Jamieson <br />Housing Concerns <br />A motion was offered by Commissioner Doherty to delete 2. Contribution to <br />the Housing Fund. <br />Roll Call Vote <br />Motion: Doherty <br />Seconded: Jamieson <br />Ayes: Doherty, Jamieson <br />Noes: Shepherd, Wood and Chairman Butler <br />Absent: None <br />Abstain: None <br />The motion did not pass. <br />Planning Analyst Brian Swift explained the rationale behind this. The <br />primary thing staff sees is to use the monies to purchase land through a <br />land banking system. <br />Commissioner Shepherd indicated he was concerned about this. In this case, <br />the developer has an option. Again, this is something where the General <br />Plan requires provision of low cost housing, so maybe it is worth it in <br />this case. <br />After some further discussion, a motion was entered and adopted recommending <br />to the City Council approval of the Incentive System Elements with the <br />proposed changes. <br />Roll Call Vote <br />Motion: Shepherd <br />Seconded: Wood <br />Ayes: Doherty, Shepherd, Wood and Chairman Butler <br />Noes: Jamieson <br />Absent: None <br />Abstain: None <br />ADJOURNMENT <br />The meeting was adjourned at 10:35 P.M. <br />Robert J. arris, Secretary <br />-7- <br /> <br />