PC 09/19/77 - Laserfiche WebLink

Chairman Butler said he would just as soon see 6. deleted. A motion was entered and adopted allocating 10 points to Agriculturally Usuable Lands; 5 points for Design; 10 points to Traffic; 10 for Energy Conservation. Roll Call Vote Motion: Shepherd Seconded: Wood Ayes: Doherty, Shepherd, Wood and Chairman Butler Noes: None Absent: None Abstain: Jamieson Fiscal Concerns Commissioner Doherty had a problem with this section, he felt it was inequitable and that 4. Extra-Costly Features be eliminated. A motion was entered deleting No. 4 and reallocating the points elsewhere. Roll Call Vote Motion: Doherty Seconded: Butler Ayes: Doherty Noes: Shepherd, Wood and Chairman Butler Absent: None Abstain: Jamieson The motion did not pass. Chairman Butler felt that 5. Contribution to the Capital Improvement Fund would only serve to increase costs. Explanation as to why it was set up this way was provided by staff. A motion was entered to delete 5. Contribution to the Capital Improvement Funds with those 15 points reallocated. This motion was seconded by Chairman Butler. Commissioner Doherty then recommended giving 5 points to Missing Linkages..., 5 points to Capital Facility/Utility Dedications.. with staff allocating the remaining 5 points. At this point, Commissioner Jamieson indicated he only wished to vote on deletion of 5., and Com- missioner Doherty then withdrew his motion. Another motion was entered and adopted deleting 5. and reallocating the points as follows: 5 points to 1. 10 points to 2. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Wood, with Chairman Butler and Commissioner Shepherd voting no, Commissioner Doherty and Wood voting yes, with Commissioner Jamieson abstaining. The motion did not pass. Mr. Swift explained how 1. and 2. was originally set up, it should be 15 points for the two combined. -6-