PC 04/10/78 - Laserfiche WebLink

Considerable discussion ensued among the Commissioners regarding appeal provisions if an applicant did not agree with the determination of the Zoning Administrator as noted under Draft Ordinance A. Secretary Harris explained that the code does make proivsion for appeal either to the Board of Adjustment, Planning Commission or City Council. This ordinance amendment review came about as a result of Mr. Frank Auf der Maur's application for a medical office building within the Cedarwood complex, which would be for plastic surgery practice. Previous testimony made it apparent that the patient turnover is considerably less than that experienced by a general practitioner. The Public Hearing was opened. Mr. Mullen, Mullen-Morris-Alexander, architects for Mr. Auf der Maur's project, was present and asked for clarification of the appeal section of the code. Mr. Levine confirmed that such a procedure is in the code. The Public Hearing was closed. Commissioner Shepherd indicated he was in favor of Draft Ordinance A, as it provided sufficient flexibility. Commissioner Jamieson concurred. Resolution No. 1623 was entered and adopted initiating an amendment to Sec. 2-9.15 (c) of Article 16, Chapter 2, Title II of the Code which would give the Zoning Administrator discretion to impose parking requirements for those uses not listed in the code, and to recommend to the City Council adoption of Draft Ordinance A, which would accomplish this amendment. Roll Call Vote Resolution: Shepherd Seconded: Jamieson Ayes: Jamieson, Shepherd, Chairman Butler Noes: None Absent: Doherty Abstain: None RZ-77-16, City of Pleasanton - Application of the City of Pleasanton to prezone a 13.6 acre parcel of land located on the north side of Stanley Boulevard bounded on the north by the Western Pacific Railroad and on the east by the Southern Pacific Railroad to the C-S (Commercial Service) District or any other zoning district which the City finds to be appropriate and in conformance with the General Plan. Application continued until May 10, 1978, meeting. GP-78-1, City of Pleasanton - Review of a negative declaration for a Safety Element of the Pleasanton General Plan. Application for the adoption of a Safety Element to the Pleasanton General Plan which would contain goals, policies and implementation programs with respect to protection from fire, flood, geologic and nuclear hazards. Secretary Harris gave a brief explanation of the project. He wished to correct wording to show Policy 24 instead of Program 24 on Page 2-4, -2- fi..._ ~.___ __ ____.._ _ _.._ __.. _ _ _ _