PC 07/12/78 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Mike Harris, representative for the application, indicated that he felt the C-C zoning would be compatible for the property. He was not against utilizing the majority of the property for offices, but in order to make it a profitable business venture, at least in the initial stages, he was requesting that the lower floor be used for retail commercial uses, such as men's or women's clothing stores. He would be happy to agree to excluding uses such as liquor stores or cocktail lounges. Considerable discussion took place regarding the pros and cons of how best to utilize the property, which has had a history of applications for service stations, which have not materialized primarily because of traffic concerns. It was felt that a commercial P.U.D. might be the best type of designation for this property, which would give the City the greatest type of control yet still allow the developer some latitude for business marketability of the building. The Commissioners felt that the property could best be served with a C-C designation but under a planned unit development. Because of time con- straints for the applicant, it was decided that a list of specific uses which might be appropriate for development of the site be compiled by staff and reviewed with each member of the Commission, then submitted to the City Council at the time zoning of the site is reviewed by them. Resolution 1657 was entered and adopted making the finding that the proposed rezoning to the Commercial P.U.D. designation would not have an adverse impact on the environment and that a Negative Declaration would be filed, with a mitigating condition addressed to traffic circulation. Roll Call Vote Resolution: Doherty Seconded: Getty Ayes: Doherty, Leppert, Getty, Wilson, Jamieson Noes: None Absent: None Abstain: None Resolution 1658 was entered and adopted recommending to the City Council zoning of this property in the C-Commercial P.U.D. District, with a list of compatible uses submitted for review in conjunction with the zoning review, adding the following condition, "That because of potential traffic hazards associated with development on the subject site, no vehicular access shall be allowed between the property and Hopyard Road and a right- turn lane from Hopyard Road into Johnson Industrial Drive shall be provided as part of any development on the site." Roll Call Vote Resolution: Doherty Seconded: Wilson Ayes: Doherty, Geppert, Noes: None Absent: None Abstain: None Getty, Wilson, Jamieson -6-