PC 02/13/80 - Laserfiche WebLink

A motion was made by Con. ssioner Leppert, seconded y Commissioner Getty that case PUD-79-15 be denied without prejudice so that the developer could come back with a better proposal addressing items mentioned throughout the hearing. ROLL CALL VOTE Ayes: Commissioners Geppert, Getty, Jamieson and Chaiperson Doherty Noes: Commissioner Wilson Resolution No. 1844 was then entered and adopted denying PUD-79-15 without prejudice. Commissioner Jamieson then stated the Planning Commission and City Council have attempted to get larger lots in town and that by going below 6500 sq. ft. as requested by Mr. Oakes we would be taking a step backwards and he wouldn't support anything less than 6500 sq. ft. Commissioner Geppert stated that 50$ of the lots would be below 6500 sq. ft. standard, there might be some traffic problems in the area and no one has shown the Commission how much traffic would be removed from West Las Positas. He stated this location has bad access. Chairperson Doherty then advised Mr. Oakes he had 15 days in which to appeal the decision of the Planning Commission to the City Council. PUD-79-14, Amador Valley Investors Application of Amador Valley Investors to rezone from the R-1-6500 (Single- Family Residential) District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development) District and development plan approval for a 41-lot, single-family residential sub- division proposed to be build on a 9 acre parcel located on the south side of Fairlands Drive opposite its intersection with Brockton Drive. A negative declaration of environmental impacts was also considered. Mr. Harris explained the staff report. He stated that the 41 lots proposed to be subdivided are now part of one parcel. He stated it was a school site and that the School District evidently now doesn't feel there is a need for the school in this area. He further stated there is only one sewer connection for the property and that this proposal is very similar to the previous application but that on some lots there was only 10 foot setback to the rear property line. He stated this proposal gives no added benefit to the City and staff believes it should be at least R-1-6500. The public hearing was opened. George Oakes, the applicant stated he would like this matter continued to the March meeting so that he could work with his engineer to develop some- thing more pallatable. Commissioner Wilson stated that he would support 6500 sq. ft. for Oakes first proposal and 7500 on the second. Commissioner Getty stated she agreed with Commissioner Wilson but would like to see the size of the houses addressed. Commissioner Geppert stated he agreed with the other Commissioners on this. Commissioner Jamieson stated he would like the 27 acres to have a mix, at least, of from 7500 to 6500 and perhaps some larger than that. Commissioner Wilson then addressed Mr. Oakes inquiring about the sewer priority list -4-