PC 03/12/80 - Laserfiche WebLink

4. Concerning the slumpstone, he stated staff may not be aware that the applicant owns an easement that runs right between two lots on the site (currently owned by Edgren). Mr. Hirst showed the Commissioners the easement location on the map. He stated this refers to condition #4 of the staff report. 5. Mr. Hirst stated he agrees that the area to the rear of Building E and that it be maintained, however, would like to use the adjacent building for access as opposed to putting in an outside doorway in Building E. He stated they did not want a hallway through the building. He further stated they are amending the plan to show a parapet in Building E. 6. Concerning condition #8, Mr. Hirst stated he was not sure of this condition in that he did not feel an agreement concerning reconstruction of curb, gutter and sidewalk, together with necessary tree removal, utility relocation and tie-in paving across the Main Street frontage of the subject property should be addressed at design review. Mr. Hirst stated it would be a long time before Main Street is widened in this area. The public hearing was closed. Commissioner Getty agreed with Mr. Hirst concerning the planter walkway. She also stated she did not believe a loading berth would be necessary inasmuch as most deliveries are of the U.P.S. type and not large trucks. Mr. Harris stated that if there is no loading berth, a variance must be approved prior to design approval. Commissioner Jamieson asked that the applicant come forward again and explain his views concerning this, i.e., whether he wanted this matter continued for a variance or whether he wished to proceed. Commissioner Wilson suggested that a loading berth be designated on the plan so that this project could proceed. Commissioner Jamieson concurred. Mr. Harris addressed Mr. Hirst's concerns. He stated staff recommended condition #2 because they didn't feel this area would be used for a walkway and the civic overlay district requires 10$ landscaping and this planter strip would help meet this requirement. He stated the development as proposed has just about 10~ and an additional planter strip would be helpful. Mr. Harris stated it wouldn't make too much difference one way or the other if the Commission allowed this to become a walkway. Concerning the slumpstone wall, he stated the Civic Overlay District requires a masonry wall and that currently there are two dissimilar fences on the property and that the Valley Bank was required to put one in next door. Further the two houses mentioned have been occupied for -4-