My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 03/18/81
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1981
>
PC 03/18/81
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 4:20:35 PM
Creation date
4/30/2007 9:28:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/18/1981
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 03/18/81
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Dr. Pridemore asked when the grading would probably occur? Mr. <br />McCoy responded, it would probably be during the summer months. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Doherty, seconded by Commissioner <br />Lindsey, that the elevations and site plans submitted by Centex be <br />approved subject to the three conditions of the staff report of <br />3/18/81, adding that <br />1. The applicant will execute the visual easements <br />and provide them to the City of Pleasanton, who <br />in turn will notify, by certified mail, all pro- <br />perty owners on Angela Street and Mirador Drive <br />whose property is contiguous to the development <br />that the visual easements are ready to be signed and <br />that they will have a period not to exceed 60 days <br />in which to do so. <br />2. That lot number 78 shall contain a single story <br />structure not to exceed 448'. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />Ayes: Commissioners Doherty, Jamieson, Lindsey and <br />Acting Chairperson Getty <br />Noes: None <br />Absent: Chairperson Wilson <br />Abstain: None <br />Resolution No. 1973 was then entered and adopted approving the <br />elevations and site plans for Centex as conditioned in their PUD. <br />Changes to RM standards in the Downtown Area. <br />Mr. Harris reviewed the staff report. <br />Commissioner Jamieson asked about condominium conversions in the <br />area. Mr. Harris said that until the City adopts a condominium <br />conversion ordinance there is no assurance that conversion will <br />not take place. <br />Commissioner Doherty asked about the boundaries included in the <br />exhibit attached to the staff report. Mr. Harris said tYiat to <br />eliminate certain properties could be spot zoning property and <br />this would be very difficult to control. <br />Commissioner Getty spoke to parking in the downtown area. She <br />stated she sees no reason to allow the reduction in the amount of <br />parking allotted in the downtown area for residential use; Ray <br />Street should probably be a one-way street. She said some people <br />on the south side of that street are getting upset because three <br />parking spaces were eliminated (marked in red) and none of the <br />commercial property owners in the neighborhood were notified. She <br />said people in the core area will park, shop and then eat and it <br />is incomprehensible to her why the variance was denied for the <br />Gay 90's. <br />Commissioner Getty then said Southern Pacific will probably employ <br />about 250 employees and will have about 245 parking spaces - <br />and asked if some of the employees couldn't use the Citizens <br />-4- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.