PC 06/17/81 - Laserfiche WebLink

Minutes Planning Commission 6/17/81 This matter was continued to the Planning Commission meeting of July 15, 1981, Cultural Arts Center. NEW BUSINESS - Public Hearings Taubman Company,' Inc. Application of the Taubman Company, Inc., for development agreement for four parcels of land including: 43.9+ acres consisting of the eastern and western portion of the area surrounded by Stoneridge Mall Road (APN 941-1201-30); the 7+ acre site on the east side of Foothill Road between Stoneridge Drive and Laurel Creek Way; the 4+ acre site on the north side of Stoneridge Mall Road adjacent to Highway 580 (a portion of APN 941-1201-33); and a .9+ acre site located at the southwest intersection located on the southwest corner of the intersection of Stoneridge Mall Road and Canyon Way. The development agreement would provide for phasing of development of the above listed sites as well as the assurance of existing zoning. Mr. Harris stated that the staff report was prepared by the City Attorney's office and that the agreement would give vested rights to the land owner. Commissioner Wilson said that the staff report is a very good one. Harvey Levine, City Attorney, stated that the agreement was generated by the property owner and covers a vested period of ten years. He explained that this agreement comes about as a result of recent legislation. Commissioner Lindsey asked concerning Item No. 2 if the developer would be able to add on a large store in the shopping center and would that store have design review approval. Mr. Levine stated that yes they could add a major store, but that height control by the Design Review Board would be limited by the agreement. The public hearing was opened. Mr. Eynck, Taubman Company, stated that the agreement only covers four parcels. Mr. Levine stated that the agreement would give the developer rights concerning uses under zoning for 10 years. Robert Gibney, attorney for Taubman, spoke to the duration of the agreement as shown on Page 2 thereof. Mr. Eynck stated that the nature of the agreement is to suggest orderly development of projects and that there has to be cextain dates for development of the properties. Commissioner Wilson asked about other developers going through this same process. Mr. Gibney stated that if all .parties are in agreement, they would go through the same process. Commissioner Wilson spoke to sewer permit expiration dates of the developments. He stated he didn't want Pleasanton to lose sewer permits to Dublin. He asked if one of the parcels was sold would the agreement run with the land? Mr. Levine said it would. Commissioner Wilson then asked if Kaiser had closed escrow and Mr. Gibney said it has and that a representative of Kaiser is present at this -2- ___. _ _ _