My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 07/15/81
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1981
>
PC 07/15/81
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2017 4:16:54 PM
Creation date
4/30/2007 9:13:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
7/15/1981
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 07/15/81
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The staff recommends 80 lots rather than 81 because lots 29-39 <br />are too narrow and one lot can be removed and the others widened. <br />The following conditions were changed to read as follows: <br />4. That since part of the property is in a flood zone as <br />defined by the Federal Insurance Administration, all <br />actions necessary to comply with the National Flood <br />Insurance Act of 1968 shall be complied with in con- <br />junction with the development of the subject property. <br />9. That the developer dedicate to the City for street right- <br />of-way purposes, those parcels of land that will be public <br />streets which serve the lots of the subdivision. <br />20. That the developer incorporate a preliminary erosion and <br />sedimentation control plan as part of the tentative map <br />submittal. <br />33a. That the dedications and improvements set forth in condi- <br />tions 31, 32, and 33 shall, to the extent that these are <br />greater than those required in the Park Land Dedication <br />Ordinance of the City, be considred to be gifts to the <br />city and not requirements of this ordinance. This shall <br />be contingent upon an offer by the owner and acceptance <br />by the city. <br />Commissioner Lindsey felt that a similar recommendation (to reduce <br />by one lot) for lots 21-28 should be made and asked Mr. Harris why <br />it was not done. <br />Mr. Harris responded by saying he felt the lots across the street <br />were a little wider. <br />Commissioner Lindsey asked if developer would be required to plant <br />a large buffer zone of trees across the back. <br />Mr. Harris indicated there would be some sort of natural landscaping <br />requiring low maintenance, not irrigated park. <br />Commissioner Wilson expressed concern that a grading plan was not <br />submitted with the data and felt Planning Commission needed the <br />material to make its determination. He also wanted a noise study. <br />In the Negative Declaration Item 3, there is no geologist's report <br />on the earthquake fault. <br />Mr. Harris indicated most of the information mentioned was handed <br />out in a booklet previously submitted to the Commission. Much <br />discussion ensure regarding the Calaveras Fault and it was finally <br />determined that it did not extend onto the developer's property. <br />-3- <br />__-.___. _.T....,,.._.__. _. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.