PC 11/18/81 - Laserfiche WebLink

Condition No. 8: Mr. Tyler asked that the right-of-way be 41 ft. with a sidewalk on one side only as shown on the plan. Condition No. 9: Mr. Tyler took issue with this condition. He said the knuckle is shown because it is not known what will be developed to the north of the project site. Mr. Warnick said the flexibility is needed in this regard but that it can be worked out with staff. Condition No. 34: Mr. Tyler asked how much money would be involved and he understood that his type of project would be exempted from this assessment district. Mr. Warnick indicated that residential develop- ments would only be exempted from the traffic portion of the assess- ment district. Mr. Harris indicated that Sid Corrie's property will also be subject to these same conditions. Mr. Warnick estimated roughly that it would cost $6,000,000 and spread over 1200± acres which comes to about $5,000/acre but that there would be a report available in two to three weeks which would more accurately depict the figure. Mr. Tyler asked for exemption for conditions number 34, 35 and 36 and asked that condition number 37 be clarified and asked the cost if implemented. Mr. Warnick explained stating that this development should pay for a portion of the street as Morrison has had to do the same thing. Chairperson Getty told Mr. Tyler their development would only be paying 'their fair share' for the area of improvement. Commissioner Wilson said he would be prepared to approve this and note that conditions number 34 through 38 be discussed by City Council concerning their policy prior to tentative map stage and that staff would come up with the cost for these items. He said the most important thing is to get the application approved and work with City staff and get the policy from City Council. He said these same conditions appear for every application considered for the last six months. Commissioner Wilson indicated he thought City Council has exempted residential developments from all of the assessment districts. Mr. Harris indicated that what the City Council said is that as part of the affordable housing competition, if there is one, this is the type of thing they will look at waiving and if his PUD is approved with all these conditions, he may wish to compete and if he is chosen, it could be that City Council may elect to waive these requirements at that time and subsequently amend his PUD, but the staff and Planning Commission are not in a position to prematurely waive anything. Commissioner Wilson asked Mr. Tyler if he is familiar with the bond issue and asked if it was true affordable housing would be available to persons making less than $36,000. Council member Karin Mohr indi- cated the income estimate was based on the Bay Area, not just our community. Commissioner Wilson asked if the owner would have to live in the house for a long time. Mr. Tyler indicated a person would have to reside in the house at least one year. -8-