Laserfiche WebLink
Page 16 <br />Minutes <br />Planning Commission <br />Dick Davis, 2283 Sea Eagle Court spoke. to the lack of the parking <br />in the area. His property is next door to the proposal. He <br />urged more parking be provided in this proposed development. <br />Mr. Goode, 3884_ Vineyard Avenue, who lives across the street <br />said that on one side of Vineyard Avenue there is no parking <br />allowed and in fact his single-family dwelling doesn't have <br />sufficient parking. He stated he also doesn't know why all of the <br />High Density Residential is on Vineyard Avenue. He also indicated <br />he cannot share the optimism regarding the Pico Avenue extension <br />that everyone else seems to feel. He said the only people who <br />will use the extension will be those commuting to Livermore because <br />to go down Pico to Stanley, turning left to town to Main Street to <br />get to I-580 is a move people will not want to take and tha t <br />improvement will only occur when Valley Avenue is extended to <br />Stanley Blvd. <br />Mike Harris rebutted the statements made by the previous speakers <br />stating that they are proposing a quality development using wood <br />and not stucco and urged the Planning Commi ssion to recommend <br />approval . <br />The public hearing-was closed. <br />Commissioner Wilson addressed the negative declaration where <br />it speaks to 143 parking spaces and now that figure has changed. <br />He said he would like to see the number of units reduced and <br />doesn't think three guest parking spaces for the development is <br />helpful at all. He said he would like to see the number of <br />units reduced to 52. <br />A motion was then made by Commissioner Doherty seconded by Commissioner <br />Wilson that the negative declaration prepared for case PUD-81-32 <br />be adopted because approval of case PUD-81-32 would not have a <br />significant adverse effect on the environment. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />Ayes Commissioners Doherty, Wilson, <br />Jamieson-and Chairperson Getty <br />Noes None <br />Absent Commissioner Lindsey <br />Abstain None <br />Resolution No.2106 was then entered and adopted recommending <br />approval of the negative declaration as prepared for case. PUD-81-32 <br />as motioned. <br />A motion was then made by Commissioner Wilson, seconded by <br />Commissioner Jamieson that case PUD-81-32 be recommended for approval <br />per the conditions of the staff report of 12/9/81, but amending the <br />proposal by reducing the number of units to 52 to allow for <br />increased parking and open space. <br />