Laserfiche WebLink
RZ-81-23, City of Pleasanton <br />Mr. Harris explained Mr. Vic Lund's (the property owner) request for a <br />modification to the Planning Commission prezoning application concerning <br />the recent prezoning of the 250 acre site. He said that Mr. Lund has <br />asked that the following condition be added to the recommendation for <br />prezoning: <br />That when a development plan is submitted on the subject <br />property the City shall consider, if requested by the <br />property owner, a shift in residential density from Parcel <br />2 as shown on the accompanying map, Exhibit A, attached <br />hereto and made part of this case by reference, to Parcel 1 <br />as shown on that same map. Density on Parcel 1 shall not <br />exceed 3 dwelling units per gross acre. Nothing herein <br />shall be construed as guaranteeing any certain residential <br />density on any part of the subject property. Specific <br />density will be established only by approval of a develop- <br />ment plan; and the City at this time is not approving any <br />specific number of dwelling units on any part of the <br />subject site. <br />The public hearing was opened. <br />Vic Lund, 2000 Marciel, Livermore, explained the request and urged <br />approval of the proposed condition. He said they would like to be <br />able to transfer density from the back of the property to the front <br />because they are not planning to sell the back 200 acres at this <br />time. <br />Commissioner Wilson asked if 196 acres would remain in the Williamson <br />Act. Mr. Lund said it would remain in the Williamson Act for nine <br />years from January 1, 1982. <br />The public hearing was closed. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Wilson, seconded by Commissioner <br />Jamieson, that the condition as stated be incorporated into the <br />Planning Commission recommendation of approval for case R2~-81-23. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />Ayes: Commissioners Doherty, Jamieson, Lindsey, Wilson and <br />Chairperson Getty <br />Noes: None <br />Absent: None <br />Abstain: None <br />Resolution No. 2112 was then entered and adopted for case RZ-81-23 as <br />motioned. <br />ADJOURNMEIIT <br />There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 12:10 a.m. <br />by Chairperson Getty. <br />Respectf ly submitted, <br />c . L.. '~...,J <br />4 <br />Rtb ~rt J,' Harris , Secretary <br />-15- <br />__ <br />