PC 12/16/81 - Laserfiche WebLink

MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION Pleasanton, California Cafeteria at the Alameda County Fairgrounds Pleasanton Avenue Wednesday, December 16, 1981 7:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 7:10 p.m. by Chairperson Getty. The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was recited. ROLL CALL Commissioners Present: Gregg Doherty, Bill Jamieson, Larry Lindsey, DeWitt Wilson and Joyce Getty Commissioners Absent: None Staff Members Present: Robert J. Harris, Director of Planning and Community Development; Robert L. Warnick, Director of Public Works and Utilities; Brian W. Swift, Assistant Cit y Attorney and Shirley McDougall, Recording Secretary Council Members Present: None APPROVAL OF MINUTES None were submitted for review. MEETING OPEN FOR MEi~1BERS OF THE AUDIENCE TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION No one addressed the Commission. REVISIONS AND OMISSIONS TO THE AGENDA Mr. Harris in icated that a zoning problem exists at 1851 Rose Avenue, property owned by Mr. Altieri and the matter is to be added to this agenda as item 7a. He further indicated that the property owned by Vic Lund recently prezoned should be discussed to add another condition as 7b. MATTERS INITIATED BY THE COMMISSION MEMBE RS Chairperson Getty indicated that a lot of material was distributed to the Commission for review for the first time at tonights meeting and wondered if the Parrish and Daon projects should be deferred for review of the items distributed. Commissioner Jamieson stated he felt that over the past several months they have had too much, too soon, to consider and that in 1982 it would be a good idea to revert to one meeting a month for the Planning Com- mission, Design Review Board and Board of Adjustment. Other Commissioners indicated they didn't have time to study the information provided. They indicated this has been brought up and carried out in the motion made by Commissioner Wilson at the last meeting concerning the proposed moratorium on development applications. They indicated they have not received direction from City Council yet regarding sewers, RAP exemptions, etc. Mr. Harris explained the additional material furnished by the staff to the Commission was for informational purposes only and that the matter of park dedication fees being waived as mentioned in the memorandum from the Park and Recreation Commission is not a matter over which the Planning Commission has control.