PC 02/23/83 - Laserfiche WebLink

P/C~ Page 12 2/23/83 Commissioner Arrigoni spoke to Condition No. 5 concerning pro-rata of water facilities and asked how this is handled. Mr. Harris explained. The public hearing was opened. Art Dunkley, Castlewood Properties, Inc., 205-F Main Street represented the application. He thanked staff for working so diligently on the project for the last 10 months. He asked about the impact on the proposed staff change to Condition No. 34 relating to use of the property. Mr. Harris stated he just wanted the use of the property to be that of the residential district only and wanted this matter clearly stated in the condition. Mr. Dunkley asked about having horses on the property. Mr. Swift responded to his question by stating that a horse would be allowed on 40,000 sq. ft. plus one horse for each additional acre but that pigs, goats, etc. would not be allowed. Mr. Dunkley said he has no problem with this clarification. Mr. Dunkley then presented the history of the project and that one acre .minimum lot sizes were rejected by the staff. He further stated he agrees with the staff report except in three instances. Mr. Dunkley then put up the map of the Circulation Study for the benefit of all parties. He mentioned that while they own less than three percent of the land they have paid for over 20% of the cost of the study. Fle explained his proposal for Crellin Road. Mr. Harris then went to the Circulation Study map and explained the basis for the study and its recommendations. He stated many alternatives were looked at and submitted to the staff (including Fire Department, Police Department, Engineering Department, et al) for overall staff input. He said as a result it was agreed that the road system would be confined to the ridge areas rather than the valleys because of disturbance to the ecology and the requirement of more grading in the latter situation. He gave examples. He explained also how the Chamberlain property would come into play. Chairperson Lindsey asked about the Crellin Road width being increased to 40'. Mr. Harris said it would provide two travel and two parking lanes. Chairperson Lindsey questioned the need for parking on both sides of the street in rural environments. He indicated that the volume of traffic in the section would have to be determined to know for sure. Commissioner Jamieson asked for clarification of the map with regard to County boundary and property lines. Mr. Harris explained. Mr. Dunkley explained how the changes in the plan evolved and there is a major impact with the change to Crellin as proposed by staff in that the project will go from being privately maintained with gates, etc. to nothing more than a regular type subdivision. He further stated there was a water study done in connection with the Circulation Study. He explained the boundaries of the study. He further stated that the water study says there probably will only be about 106 units in the entire 560 acre area. He said you don't need 41' roads in the area. He further stated that there is already an easement for the extension of Arbor Drive over the Kottinger Ranch property and there would be no need for two parallel streets. Mr. Dunkley has met with the Fire Department and one of the things Mr. Dunkley suggested from the beginning would be the dedication of emergency access between Lots 10 and 11. He still suggested this so that there would be a homeowners association, entrance gates and general enhancement of the area. He further stated that by putting a lien on Lots 10 and 11 for a deferred improvement agreement -1Z-