My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 05/11/83
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1983
>
PC 05/11/83
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2017 10:25:44 AM
Creation date
4/27/2007 4:41:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/11/1983
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 05/25/83
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PLANNING COMMISSI01`I <br />Page 2 <br />5/11/83 <br />Mr. Warnick introduced Robert Okamura, Assistant City Engineer, <br />to the Commission. <br />REVISIONS OR OMISSIONS TO THE AGENDA <br />There were none. <br />MATTEP..S INITIATED BY COMMISSION T1ET7BERS <br />Commissioner ?~oherty raised a question of staff regarding <br />the condition of the roadwav at the south end of Valley Avenue <br />at the Arroyo. Mr. Warnick~resnonded that staff is aware of <br />the area and are taking measures to correct the problem. <br />OLD BUSINESS - Public Hearings <br />PUD-83-7, Holiday Inn <br />Application of Holiday Inns, Inc. and First rdationwide Savings <br />and Loan for PUD (Planned Unit Development) development plan <br />approval of a 249 room, seven story hotel structure and related <br />facilities on a 4.39 acre site located near the northwest corner <br />of Dublin Canyon and Foothill Roads. Zoning for the property <br />is PUD (Planned Unit Development)-Central Commercial District. <br />Mr. Harris reviewed the staff report recommending approval of <br />the application with certain conditions. He indicated Holiday <br />Inn will not have a measurable impact on the Dublin Canyon Road <br />and Foothill P..oad intersection, but that it is possible in the future <br />some a.c~.ditional work would have to be done to the intersection <br />and Holiday would be required to participate in those improvements. <br />A geologic report was required since a portion of the property <br />is in the Calaveras Fault hazard zone, ho~•aever, no trace of the <br />fault was found. <br />Mr. Warnick brought up the problem of conflictin4 traffic <br />studies. The first one prepared by P?tC Voorhees predicted the <br />worst case to be at Level D. Subsequent to that report, certain <br />changes were made and they now _f eel the worst case level to <br />be at Level E, which is not acceptable. This was not based on <br />Holiday Inn, but simply indicates there is more traffic than <br />expected in 1980. Staff could redesign the intersection and <br />put the changes into an assessment district, but his inclination <br />is to build the intersection as now designed and perhaps require <br />Holiday Inn and other developers to participate in an assessment <br />district in the future should it be required. Mr. Warnick <br />mentioned a couple of mitigating measures which could be taken <br />to change the Level, including; precluding outbound lanes turning <br />left into the mall thereby eliminating the problem of weaving <br />and he brought up the fact that the traffic count was taken <br />before the diamond lanes were removed. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.