PC 06/08/83 - Laserfiche WebLink

MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION June 8, 1982 Building No. 11 consisting of eight units be removed and the area used for recreation. Commissioner Wilson concurred with this. Commissioner Wilson indicated that as a Commissioner he doesn't like multiple units like this to come up because no one wants them in their neighborhoods but that the General Plan must be conformed to as required by the State of California. He further stated that the public should write to Assemblymen and Senators if they are not in accord with this. Chairman Jamieson asked the staff the density of the project as there appears to be confusion as to whether the site is 12.3 acres or 11 acres. Mr. Harris explained the gross acreage, less the improvements including the park. Mr. Harris further indicated that the Initial Study should be changed to show Water Impacts and Plant and Animal Impacts to be insignificant because of the improvements of the project. A motion was made by Commissioner Wilson, seconded by Commissioner Getty that the negative declaration prepared for case PUD-83-9 be recommended for adoption because approval of the project itself would not have a significant effect on the environment. ROLL CALL VOTE AYES: Commissioners Doherty, Getty, Lindsey, Wilson and Chairman Jamieson NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Resolution No. 2310 was entered and adopted recommending approval of the Negative Declaration prepared for case PUD~83-9 as motioned. Commissioner Doherty indicated he would like an additional condition be added to the staff report reflecting that if Indian artifacts, etc. are uncovered that construction be halted and the Planning Division notified so that proper steps could be taken to preserve such a find in accordance with usual policy governing this. The Commissioners agreed this would be a good condition. A motion was made by Commissioner Lindsey, seconded by Commissioner Getty that case PUD-83-9 be recommended for approval subject to the conditions of the staff report of 6/8/83, amending condition No. 1 to reflect that Building No. 11 shall be eliminated and the area is to be used for a recreation area. This area is to be reviewed by the Planning Division. Additionally, conditions number 22, 57, 66, and 67 as distributed on Exhibit "B" at the Planning Commission meeting are to be changed accordingly; Condition No. 69 which requires that in the event archaeological or historical artifacts are discovered during development, construction should be halted to allow for an adequate evaluation of the site be added. -9-