Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />JULY 13, 1983 <br />Page 6 <br />Mr. Fisk indicated they did not wish this matter continued <br />for resolution because it would slow down the progession of <br />the project. Mr. Harris suggested that the Planning Commission <br />allow the parties to resolve the differences before the <br />proposal comes before the City Council. <br />Commissioner Wilson asked about the type of fencing being <br />proposed and Mr. Fisk responded that it would be chainlink <br />with redwood slats. <br />Commissioner Lindsey asked if the materials stored would be <br />less than the six feet height of the fence. Mr. Fisk indicated <br />it would be. <br />Bob Erickson, Sales Manager, Westinghouse Supply, Concord, <br />stated he would be the manager of the proposed facility. <br />He reviewed the type of items to be stored. They would <br />supply contractors with electrical products on a wholesale <br />basis. Mr. Erickson said that Westinghouse doesn't make any <br />PCB transformers and there will be no storage of such transformers <br />having PCB of any brand. <br />Commissioner Wilson asked about the sales tax revenue generated <br />from this business. Mr. Erickson indicated that in excess <br />of 900 of their sales are subject to sales tax. <br />The public hearing was closed. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Lindsey, seconded by <br />Commissioner Getty that approval of PUD-82-18-3D will have <br />no adverse environmental effect and therefore that the Negative <br />Declaration prepared for this case be recommended for approval.. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />AYE5: Commissioners Doherty, Getty, Lindsey, <br />Wilson and Chairman Jamieson <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br />Resolution No. 2326 was entered and adopted recommending approval <br />of the Negative Declaration prepared for CASE PUD-82-18-3D as <br />motioned. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Lindsey, seconded by Commissioner <br />Doherty that case PUD-82-18-3D be recommended for approval <br />subject to the conditions shown in the staff report of 7/13/83 <br />with the understanding that staff and applicant are to work <br />together to resolve differences in conditions prior to this <br />matter being considered by the. City Council. <br />-6- <br />_t w...._._. .....w...... ., ~.._~_.. ...._... ,.. ... ._~.. T <br />