PC 08/24/83 - Laserfiche WebLink

Page 17 Minutes Planning Commission Steve Hughes, 587 Touriga Court, was opposed to the project and stated the Planning Commission already knows how it will vote. Chairman Jamieson stated that assumption is not correct. Mr. Hughes stated that Roger Manning doesn't speak for anyone other than himself. Mr. Hughes did not like the integration of commercial and residential property. He urged the Commission to not support the project. Doyle Heaton spoke again on behalf of the project. He took exception about the statement made with regard to lack of sufficient parking. He stated there is more than enough parking at the shopping center. He stated that the project has been before both the Planning Commission and City Council for a general plan amendment and received plenty of notice. He stated he has met with two different associations in the area and is not hiding. Commissioner Getty indicated that from what she understands all over the state, this type of a project, i.e, residential/ commercial is very basic. She would think the manager of Flair Market would be happy to have residential on the property. She felt the commercial uses would be used by the people in the area cutting down traffic eliminating excessive traffic on Vineyard Avenue. Commissioner Lindsey felt it would be an excellent aesthetic buffer from total retail to total residential/retail. Commissioner Doherty had no particular concerns with the project, but was concerned that there is a homeowners association being notified and another association is not. He asked how many homeowners associations are in the area. He wasn't sure who represented who in the area. Chairman Jamieson asked if there was any solution to the notification problem. Mr. Harris indicated that there are three typed pages of people who were notified of this, notification was in the legal section of the newspaper and the homeowners association is on the listing to receive agendas. Chairman Jamieson suggested that a notice could be given to every applicant suggesting they contact the homeowners of the area. The public hearing was closed. A motion was made by Commissioner Lindsey, seconded by Commissioner Wilson that the negative declaration prepared for case PUD-83-14 be recommended for approval inasmuch as approval of the project would have no significant adverse effect on the environment. ROLL CALL VOTE AYES: Commissioners Doherty, Getty, Lindsey, Wilson and Chairman Jamieson NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Resolution No. 2348 was entered and adopted recommending approval of the Negative Declaration prepared for case PUD-83-14.