My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 09/14/83
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1980-1989
>
1983
>
PC 09/14/83
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2017 10:24:32 AM
Creation date
4/27/2007 4:18:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
9/14/1983
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 09/14/83
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMI1980N <br />September 14, <br />Page 4 <br />Ms. Mayhew felt that apartments <br />their pets to the area and this <br />situation. <br />The public hearing was closed. <br />Commissioner <br />to object to <br />piecemealing <br />would bring <br />would create <br />Doherty stated that some of <br />this application. He felt <br />the street, the entire area <br />children and <br />a dangerous <br />the neighbors seem <br />that rather than <br />should be looked <br />at. <br />Commissioner Getty had no problem with that but felt thieneral <br />Since the g <br />application should be looked at sepaCatylCouncil three times <br />plan changes are only considered by o at one time. <br />per year, he would still like to see it all g <br />Commissioner Wilson askedHarrisestated itrwould~ulgehstated <br />to be readvertised. Mr. <br />that since it is only the middle of eneralbplanhamendment. <br />at least two months to advertise a g lication should stand <br />Commissioner Getty still felt this aPP lan amendment <br />on its own and that a separate general p <br />should be initiated. Commissioner Lindsey supported Commissioner <br />Getty's comments. <br />Commissioner Wilson statCo~nmhssioneheastronglytopposedtit <br />was before the Planning lication <br />and has now changed his mind because the originaroaePty <br />was heard in 1978. He stated the o°riatenland useP eufelt <br />wasn't demolished because of inapp p H <br />was demolished because it was ready ro erty anwabeyance. <br />five years was long enough to hold p P <br />In talking to Debra Strong of the Chamber of Commerce Commissioner <br />Wilson determined that if abeldoneafornattleastoonehyearwntown <br />area is completed it won t <br />if in fact such a study takes place. He did not clicationt <br />the comments oftheecorefarea islmo~efthoroughlypdeveloped. <br />until at least <br />He didn't see any objection to having more than one Main <br />Street. He felt the development of housing in this are <br />the trains, trucks <br />would be subjected to noise caortedbMr. Amaral's application. <br />and other activities. He supP He said <br />Commissioner Lindseyhcthe1PolicehDepartment anddhave ~eodked <br />they are working wit <br />specifically at this licationoi~n11981nand supportssit now. <br />he supported this app <br />Commissioner Getty askeWarnickastatedatheretwererabout 1000 <br />on Peters Avenue. 1"~r• ear. Commissioner <br />trips last year and 5,000 vehicle trips this y <br />Getty stated she could find no negative impacts with this <br />proposal. <br />Chairman Jamieson concurred thastpofetheAPlanningsCommissaoners' <br />the area and agreed with the re <br />comments on this matter. _4_ <br />.. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.