Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMI1983N <br />September 14, <br />Page 3 <br />Mr. Harris presented the staff report <br />recommending denial. <br />Commissioner Getty asked how many vacant lots <br />on the west side of Peters which are privately <br />and not created by the construction of Peters <br />The Commission concurred there are three lots. <br />there are <br />owned <br />Avenue. <br />ublic hearin was opened. <br />The p g <br />1811 Santa Rita Road, the applicant did not <br />Lee Amaral, He felt circumstances have <br />agree with the staff report•lication. The completion <br />changed since their last aPP changed the neighborhood <br />of Peters Avenue has totally ro riate. <br />and a residential land useonePegers1and160nfeetnonrStPp p <br />His property has 160 feet <br />Mary Street. He felt no residThe1comdletionmoftPeterse <br />ro erty would work. p <br />subject p P <br />Avenue has caused the trafficfeltlthataan officegbuilding y <br />He He indicated <br />change the neighborhood. <br />with two offices in it would bearotodlooktlike a single-family <br />it could be landscaped and app <br />dwelling. <br />asked if the property would front <br />Commissioner Lindsey Amaral explained there was no Peter <br />on Peters Avenue. Mr. ast so the house fronted on <br />Avenue in this area in the p <br />St. Mary Street but with anmilfldwellinguwererbuiltniteters. <br />He felt even if a single-fa Y <br />would have to front on Peters Avenue. <br />4487 Pleasanton Avenue, spoke in favor <br />John Caroline, lan amendment. He stated there <br />of the proposed general p reed <br />is a new office being built at Peters/Bernal and ag <br />ears past <br />with Mr. Amaral that cgecfelt thatewith theyausuto have <br />are no longer valid. <br />money spent on Peters Avenue, it was ridiculo He <br />three vacant lots °other lots indthefarea fronting on <br />then addressed the <br />the west side of Peters Avenue. <br />1159 Kottinger Drive, supported Mr. Amaral's <br />He felt it was dangerous <br />Larry Osborne eneral plan amendment. <br />request for a g <br />He stated <br />to put residential on thCCidentslan thePpasts and sta d <br />he had witnessed three a ical of traffic <br />the parking lot of LaRocCeOnePeterstismnot tyPrance an <br />exit on Peters. Traffi <br />generated in a residential neighborhood. <br />resented the Downtown Association, and supported <br />Judy Mayhew, rep re acing for the <br />Mr. Amaral's request. She stated thavellearned it doesn't <br />downtown assessment district they <br />make sense to run zoning down cialsstreetais commercial <br />properties. She felt a commer <br />and should not be commercial/residential. <br />-3- <br />1 _. <br />