PC 10/26/83 - Laserfiche WebLink

MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSI01~ 10/26/83 Page 9 PUD-81-30, Prudential Insurance Company of America and Callahan- Pentz Properties Application the Prudential Insurance Company of America and Callahan-Pentz Properties for Planned Unit Development (PUD-Industrial/ Commercial and Offices) zoning and development plan approval of a 573 acre "business park" to include approximately 23 net acres of "garden" offices, 62 net acres of general offices, 50 net acres of "Mid-rise" offices, 47 net acres of industrial/warehousing, 273 net acres of research and development/light manufacturing, and 38 acres of retail commercial/financial development with the remaining approximately 80 acres to be used for street and flood channel right-of-way purposes, to be located on the east side of Hopyard Road between the Arroyo Mocho and a point approximately 1400 feet south of I-580 and extending east to the tracks of the Southern Pacific Transportation Company. Zoning for the property is PUD (Planned Unit Development)-Commercial Freeway, Offices, Industrial Park, General Industrial, and Light Industrial Districts. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) will also be considered. Chairman Jamieson stated that the above two cases would be heard at the same time with separate motions concerning the actions taken. He read the caption at the top of the agenda relating to the time allowed to each speaker. He indicated each speaker would be allowed five minutes each with ten minutes for rebuttal for each side. He stated that a timer would be set so that everyone would have a chance to address the issues. He asked the speakers not to be redundant in their comments. Commissioner Getty stated she wanted to make it a matter of public record that the Planning Commission has read the traffic studies and Environmental Impact Reports and understands what the statements are saying. Chairman Jamieson stated that they have all done their homework on this subject. Chairman Jamieson asked Mr. Swift to explain the revised pages of Exhibit A, Environmental findgs of the draft resolutions concerning these two topics which were recently distributed to the Commissioners. Mr. Swift reviewed the changes relating to the "No Project" alternatives. Mr. Harris clarified that one Environmental Impact Report (EIR) covers both of the cases, i.e., it is a new one for the proposed general plan amendment and serves as a supplement for the Planned Unit Development (PUD-81-30). He asked that Conditions No. 1 and 106 be changed in the staff report as follows: 1. That the development shall be substantially as shown in the development plan, Exhibit A, the Design Guidelines, Exhibit B, and Articles IV and V and Section 13.4 of the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions, Exhibit C, all on file with the Planning Division, except that the Design Guidelines ~ all be modified to clarify that all building and site design shall be approved by the City. Modifications to the Development Plan, Design Guidelines, and Articles IV and V of Section 13.4 of the CC&R's shall be governed by Article 14, Chapter 2, Title II of the Ordinance Code of the City of Pleasanton -9-