Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />12/14/83 <br />Page 4 <br />UP-83-53, Barratt <br />Applicaiton of Barratt Northern California, Inc. for a conditional use permit to <br />operate a model home complex consisting of five model homes, a sales office, parking <br />area and related facilities at the terminus of Corte Arboles in the vicinity of the <br />southwest corner of Via de los Milagros and Valley Avenue. Zoning for the property <br />is PUD (Planned Unit Development)-High Density Residential District. <br />Mr. Harris presented the staff report. He stated that proposed findings have been <br />distributed to the Commission as they were inadvertently left off of the staff report. <br />The public hearing was opened. <br />Lou Basile, Barratt Homes, read the staff report and has no problems with the <br />conditions proposed except for Condition No. 5. He stated that often times they <br />sell their models and lease them back and did not wish any wording that would <br />prevent them from doing this. He said he would like condition No. 5 to say "... <br />closed for sale" and not "...occupied." Mr. Barris stated the City wants to prevent <br />the non-development of the property leaving an unsightly area after the other development <br />has been completed. Commissioner Doherty thought that perhaps a bond could <br />be posted ensuring its development. He felt that sale and leaseback is quite a common <br />thing. Mr. Harris stated that perhaps the use permit could be approved per the <br />staff report and when the issue arises a modification could be granted. The applicant <br />stated that they just do not want to be put into a corner on this matter. <br />Commissioner Wilson asked about the improvement to the lots with regard to model <br />homes. Mr. Harris explained that they are required to put in driveways, etc. prior <br />to their sale. Commissioner Wilson then asked the applicant if they will be putting <br />in driveways. The response was, yes. Commissioner Wilson said there are many <br />instances in town where there are vacant lots and he did not wish to see this situation <br />perpetuated.. However, he did not feel the developers would allow a $40,000 lot <br />to end up vacant. He felt that staff could probably resolve the issue with the <br />applicant. Chairman Jamieson indicated that the Commission's job was to protect <br />the City. CommissionerWilson felt staff could work this out with the applicant <br />and not have to come back before the Commission. <br />Mr. Swift suggested that wording similar to the following be added to Condition <br />No. 5 "...unless some other adequate means of security is provided and approved <br />by City staff." <br />Commissionerpoherty felt this situation would come up again in the future and <br />suggested staff work up proper wording to cover it. <br />Mr. Basile asked about Condition No. 11 regarding flags. and banners.He assumed <br />the U.S. Flag would be allowed. Chairman Jamieson said this is correct, but that <br />other types of banners and flags are not allowed. <br />The public hearing was closed. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Getty, seconded by Commissioner Lindsey <br />that findings as shown in the memorandum by staff are found and that case UP-83-52 <br />be approved subject to the conditions shown in the staff report, amending Condition <br />No. 5 substantially as stated by Mr. Swift. <br /> <br />