Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes ' <br />Planning Commissior <br />12/12/84 <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Lindsey, seconded by <br />Commissioner Doherty that the negative declaration prepared for <br />case PUD-84-15 be recommended for approval, inasmuch as project <br />approval would have no significant adverse effects on the <br />environment. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />AYES: Commissioners Getty, Innes. Lindsey, Wilson and Chairman <br />Doherty <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN:None <br />Resolution No. 2585 was entered and adopted recommending approval <br />of the negative declaration prepared for case PUD-84-15 as <br />motioned. <br />Commissioner Innes felt the project would have extensive grading <br />and the property would lose its character. He was concerned with <br />open space and who would take care of it. He didn't want another <br />Cork Harbour. He felt this is a significant development and <br />would which should require contribution to the Bernal Avenue <br />Loop. <br />Commissioner Lindsey felt this is a first-class project. If <br />staff has no problem with the grading, then since he is not an <br />engineer, he doesn't either. He would recommend approval per <br />staff. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Lindsey, seconded by <br />Commissioner Getty, that Case PUD-84-15 be recommended for <br />approval subject to the conditions shown in the staff report, <br />incorporating all Revised Conditions, PUD-84-15, 12/12/84. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />AYES: Commissioners Getty, Lindsey, Wilson and Chairman Doherty <br />NOES: Commissioner Innes <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN:None <br />Resolution No. 2586 was entered and adopted recommending approval <br />of Case PUD-84-15 as motioned. <br />Commissioner Getty indicated she felt it was ridiculous to go <br />through such a project so quickly. <br />- 21 - <br />