PC 11/28/84 - Laserfiche WebLink

Minutes Planning Commissio. 11/28/84 Commissioner Wilson stepped down and Alternate Commissioner Wellman acted in his stead concerning PUD-84-16 because of conflict of interest. PUD-84-16, Savco Construction Co. Application of Savco Construction Company for PUD (Planned Unit Development) zoning and development plan approval to construct a two-story, 40-unit apartment complex on the approximately 2.5 acre parcel located on the east side of Monaco Drive, north of the offices located at 44-90 Mission Drive. Zoning for the property is PUD (Planned Unit Development)-Commercial and offices District. A Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impacts will also be considered. Mr. Harris presented the staff report recommending approval of the revised plans dated 11/28/84, Exhibit A. Commissioner Innes asked if there had been any discussion with staff on the traffic pattern eventually created at the intersection of Mission and Sunol Boulevard. Mr. Harris indicated that staff has discussed what alternatives could be looked into and one was cutting through to Sunol Boulevard. Commissioner Innes then asked if there was a formal plan designed dealing with traffic from Monaco to the intersection. Mr. Okamura said there is none. The public hearing was opened. Martin Inderbitzen, 62 West Neal Street, represented the proponents and stated that they have reviewed the plans with the homeowners. They have put an ingress and egress to Dolores Drive through the flag portion of the lot as previously shown on the landscape and open space plan. To Monaco Drive, there will be an exit only and this road would be used for emergency access for the fire department, ambulances and police departments. He indicated the homeowners appear to be satisfied with the alternative proposals. They were previously concerned with lack of parking because 74 spaces were proposed and the plan has now been revised to show 80 spaces including nine for compact cars. Roofing material was also an issue, the applicant wants composition shingle for safety and the surrounding homeowners want shake. He presented a brochure for perusal of the Commission. He indicated their interest is primarily one of safety inasmuch as the cost is very close between the two products. G. Michael Goldsworthy, 78 Mission Drive, indicated the distance from Building C to the nearest parking space is approximately 80-90' which is not abnormally long. In apartment complexes many times a parking space is assigned on a first-come, first-served basis, and the tenant is charged for the second space. Mr. Inderbitzen interjected that originally D and E were only one building. Commissioner Lindsey asked about the access to Dolores Drive and the length to where it opens. Mr. Goldsworthy responded that it is about 250 feet in length. It is about 26-28' on the side with - 3 -