Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes <br />Planning Commission <br />11/14/84 <br />e Prudential, urged approval of the project and <br />Roger Gag , <br />introduced Ed Hope of Marriotts. <br />Ed Hope, Marriott Hotels, presented their proposal. He explained <br />the court yard concept vs other lodging facilities. They have <br />determined there is a need for this tePc.°f Heapresenteddatresumee <br />replacing the old type Holiday Inns, resentation <br />of his experience in the hotel businerimarilylservice the guests <br />was made. Their restaurant will too l will be inside so that it <br />of their facilities. Tthesyearnd Their meeting facilities will <br />can be used all during <br />be limited with a 49 person capacity in each of the two rooms <br />proposed. The landscape plan was then reviewed <br />Commissioner Innes the~a~~kaa aboutr20% below thetfirstoclassMr. <br />Hope said they would s <br />facility in the San FranctocfuBnishrhim writh aocopYnofcthedrhe <br />would be more than happy <br />pricing structure. Mr. Hope stated that Marriott is financing <br />rofit a 60% occupancy. They will be <br />this venture and can make a pe tenants during the week with <br />having transit commercial typ <br />persons visiting friends using their facilities on the weekends. <br />The public hearing was closed. <br />Commissioner Innes discushotel1thMrtaKinzelcofaTJKM wasgthenrd <br />Road as a result of this <br />invited to participate in this discussiosed.MrCommissioner Innes <br />foresee a problem with circulation prop traffic in the area. <br />asked if signs should be installed directing <br />Commissioner Getty pointed out that this matter is being <br />addressed in the NPDEIR. ationHofrsigningratcthisttimestaff is <br />not recommending consider <br />Commissioner Lindsey indicated that this projehowever,fheshadlass <br />development and likes the design and concept, <br />concerns with the total number of hotel rooms in Pleasani°cantHe <br />appreciated the marketing studies and evaluation the app <br />has made in the area, but felt the numbers were too high. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Getty, seconded by Commissioner <br />Wellman that case PUD-81-30-24D be recommended for approval. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />Commissioner Getty, Innes, Wellman <br />AYES: and Chairman Doherty <br />Commissioner Lindsey <br />NOES: Commissioner Wilson <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: <br />Resolution No. 2561 was entered and adopted recommending approval <br />of case PUD-81-30-24D as motioned. <br />- 4 - <br />_~._ _ _ _ ~ <br />