Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Lindsey inquired about Warren Avenue Associates <br />currently being involved with retail and this a <br />General Industrial. Mr. Harris explained that aplication is for <br />property is unzoned as it was street right of wa portion of the <br />said that part of this property is really on o1dYHo Mr. Swift <br />Commissioner Lindsey wondered if it would make any sense toad. <br />continue on with retail use. Mr. Harris said they could do <br />either one. Under PUD they could have retail uses. Commissio <br />Lindsey asked Mr. Harris if staff has an <br />in the area. Y problems with ner <br />Mr. Harris indicated that this a Parking <br />providing sufficient parking for their use, PPlicant is <br />problem when their design review is consideredcatethesnext Desi n <br />Review Board meeting. Commissioner Lindsey was concerned with a <br />potential g <br />parking problem in the area. <br />Chairman Doherty indicated that the <br />both the general plan amendment, theprezoningaandgdevelopment °n <br />plan covering this site. He stated that separate actions would <br />be taken on each issue but public testimony would be taken <br />simultaneously, <br />Andrew Mack, Bissell and Karn, represented Prudential Insurance <br />Company of America. This project has come bout due to the <br />creation of surplus property. This will be one entry to Hacienda <br />and will be an attractive one. Iver Hilde will own the <br />when the project is a property <br />Prudential and WarrenpAvenue Assocgatesehavebbeenefinalizety <br />take care of the land transfers. d to <br />the Commission has an The architects are present if <br />Y questions concerning the development. <br />They concur with the staff report. <br />Commissioner Innes discussed the sign pro ram <br />plans. Commissioner Innes felt that there wererexcessive shens <br />proposed for the east side of the building. Michael Woldemargof <br />Michael Woldemar and Associates discussed signage with <br />Commissioner Innes. Mr. Harris pointed out that one of the <br />conditions of approval as shown in the staff report is that si n <br />application be made separately from the PUD application. g <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Lindse <br />Commissioner Innes that the negative declarationded by <br />case GP-84-12 and PUD-84-g be recommended for a prepared for <br />as approval of the proposed general plan amendmentoand plannedh <br />unit development zoning and development plan approval would not <br />have a significant effect on the environment. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />AYES: Commissioners Innes Lindse <br />Doherty Y, Wellman and Chairman <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: Commissioners Getty and Wilson <br />ABSTAIN: None <br />Resolution No. 2532 was entered and adopted recommendin <br />of the negative declaration as motioned. g approval <br />- 10 - <br />_ _. <br />._ <br />