PC 08/08/84 - Laserfiche WebLink

8/8/84 Planning Commission Page 12 John E. Smugeresky, 996 Concord Street, addressed the possibility of the development being effected by an earthquake and the potential safety of the people evacuating. Jo Harding, 3789 Grillo Court, suggested that with regard to circulation the road go through Lot No. 44 instead of the construction of a cul-de-sac. Access outside of the developemnt and Concord Avenue is needed. She would like to see the developer dedicate a park for the public. She felt most of the open space will not be suitable to build on so it is not desirable land for a park. She would like to see Kottinger Park continued. Commissioner Innes asked Mrs. Harding if she had discussed her proposed alternative with Mr. Fairfield. She indicated that she has not. Tom Caspar, 1166 Bordeau, indicated he preferred either version B or C as presented by the developer. Ted C. Fairfield responded to the comments made by the previous speakers. Regarding density he indicated that there are between 260 and 240 units allowed by the General Plan. They will only be constructing 216 units per the staff recommendation. He reviewed the various lot sizes going up the eastern end of the development, i.e., 21,000 sq. ft., 17,000 sq. ft., 14,000 sq. ft. compared to the 8,000 sq. ft. lots of the speakers. Other of their lots range from 38-54,000 sq. ft. They are allowed to be substantially smaller per the City's General Plan. They will be happy to have one story homes abut the existing Vintage Hills lots. Regarding Kottinger Park, they have already extended the park. Whether it will be private or public is another matter. The developers are not opposed to it being a public or private park. They would like consideration of this, however, with regard to park dedication fees. He addressed their proposed drainage program. He indicated that with comments concerning water pressure in the area, the pressure will go up because of the booster system by Chamnberlain which is currently under construction He stated there is currently a joint effort between Dunkley and Martin concerning a water reservoir. Mr. Fairfield indicated that did not make an effort to contact Old Towne homeowners because they did not feel they were infringing on anything in Old Towne. Mr. Fairfield said that for many years Bernal Avenue has been intended to be four lanes. If the Old Towne reisdents didn't know this, then it is a matter to be discussed between the buyer and developer. He addressed Mrs. Harding's concerns and stated that Boardeaux is not a collector. Concord Street has always been meant to be a collector. They are willing to go along with A, B, or C alternatives but frankly prefers one that goes through. Regarding the comments of the Initial Study and proposed negative declaration concerning utilities, the application currently before the Commission must be approved prior to utilities being installed. In addressing the concerns expressed by Mrs. Griffin, it is not their intention to let their property die. There are no earthquake faults in the area. The proposed development is at no more risk than Vintage Hills. Commissioner Innes asked about sidewalks in the development. Mr. Fairfield explained the proposal as well as staff's position concerning curbs and sidewalks. -12-