Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />PT_i,NNING COMMISSION <br />4/25/84 <br />Page 10 <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Lindsey, seconded by Commissioner Getty <br />that case UP-84-11 be approved as all required findings are made and that <br />such approval be subject to the conditions of the staff report, modifying <br />condition No. 2 to reflect "prior to occupancy." <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />AYES: Commissioners Doherty, Getty, Lindsey, Wilson <br />and Chairman Jamieson <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: None <br />Resolution No. 2461 was entered and adopted approving UP-84-11 as motioned. <br />RZ-84-7, City of Pleasanton <br />Application of the City of Pleasanton <br />at 4440 and 4432 Foothill Road opposi <br />Positas Boulevard to the PUD (Planned <br />Residential/Open Space District or to <br />with the General Plan. <br />to prezone approximately 120 acres <br />to its intersection with West Las <br />Unit Development) - Low Density <br />any other zoning district consistent <br />Mr. Harris presented the staff report recommending approval. <br />Commissioner Doherty asked when the West Las Positas overpass would be <br />completed. Mr. Wanrick said he has heard everything from the first of <br />May to the middle of June. Commissioner Doherty then asked about the <br />approaches. Mr. Warnick reviewed the plan. <br />Commissioner Getty expressed concern with children walking up and down <br />Foothill Road in the morning with areas of no sidewalks, paths, etc. <br />Mr. Warnick explained that there was a widening pan for Foothill Road, <br />but those plans are kind of in the air because of actions taken by the <br />Planning Commission and City Council. Foothill Knolls will have a trail <br />to the east of the project and perhaps this is a better route for the <br />children to travel than Foothill Road. <br />The public hearing was opened. <br />No one addressed the Commission. <br />The public hearing was closed <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Lindsey, seconded by Commissioner Getty <br />that the negative declaration for this rezoning be recommended for approval <br />because prezoning this property will have no significant adverse effect <br />on the environment. <br />-10- <br />. _ _ ..__.___ ..-___.__.~.r~..__ _ _ _ <br />