My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
19 ATTACHMENT
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
050107
>
REGULAR MEETING
>
19 ATTACHMENT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2007 3:33:34 PM
Creation date
4/26/2007 11:39:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
5/1/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
19 Attachments
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Boulevard at Reflections Drive drops to LOS E and would require a second <br />northbound left turn lane. <br /> <br />In summary, when comparing each of the four land use plans without Stoneridge Drive <br />extension, the volume and delay characteristics were very similar. Variations existed at <br />a few intersections, but overall the same circulation system mitigations are necessary <br />for all the land use plans. <br /> <br />The same holds true when comparing the four land use plans with Stoneridge Drive <br />extension. Minor variations exist at a few intersections but overall the necessary <br />circulation system mitigations are similar for all the land use plans. The reason there <br />are few differences in traffic impacts for the land use plans is because the plans <br />generate very similar numbers of trips. Table 1, below, provides a comparison of trips <br />for each land use plan. <br /> <br />Table 1 <br />Trip Comparison for Land Use Plans <br /> <br /> AM TRIPS AM TRIPS AM TOTAL PM TRIPS PM TRIPS PM TRIPS <br /> IN OUT IN OUT TOTAL <br />1996 General <br />Plan 48,033 32,591 80,624 46,297 57,239 103,536 <br />Consensus <br />Preferred <br />Plan 48,154 32,287 80,441 47,412 58,191 105,603 <br />Dispersed <br />Growth Plan 48,374 32,252 80,626 47,209 58,150 105,359 <br />Transit <br />Oriented <br />Development <br />Plan (ITE) 48,806 32,511 81,317 47,368 58,650 106,018 <br /> <br />Significant differences appear when the same land use is compared with and without <br />the Stoneridge Drive extension. With each of the land uses, improvements in delay are <br />common when the Stoneridge Drive extension is included in the circulation network. <br />Although the data does not show that the Stoneridge Drive extension improves the level <br />of service for a large number of critical intersections, it does decrease delay in several <br />locations, and in some cases reduces the level of improvements needed for mitigation <br />to an acceptable level of service. <br /> <br />Comparison of Volumes and Traffic Flow <br />Given the similarities of the traffic impacts for the three land use scenarios, staff decided <br />to provide the graphic analysis of volumes and traffic flow for the extension of <br />Stoneridge Drive using the Consensus Preferred Land Use Plan only. Citywide traffic <br />volumes are shown in map form in Attachments 9 through 12 for a.m. and p.m. peak <br />hours both without and with the Stoneridge Drive extension. Line widths are scaled to <br />traffic volumes to facilitate a visual comparison. Actual volume numbers are also shown <br /> <br />Page 6 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.