Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes <br />Planning Commissio; <br />4/24/85 <br />recommended for approval inasmuch as project approval would have <br />an insignificant effect on the environment. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />AYES: Commissioners Getty, Innes, Lindsey, Wilson and Chairman <br />Doherty <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIi~J :None <br />Resolution No. 2644 was entered and adopted recommending approval <br />of the negative declaration prepared for Case RZ-85-9. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Getty, seconded by Commissioner <br />Lindsey that Case RZ-85-9 be recommended for approval and that a <br />condition be added to require the access be on the south side <br />rather than Foothill Road. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE <br />AYES: Commissioners Getty, Innes, Lindsey, Wilson and Chairman <br />Doherty <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: None <br />Resolution No. 2645 was entered and adopted recommending approval <br />of Ca~.e RZ-85-9 as motioned. <br />RZ-85-10, Harold, Marcia Gregerson and Gregory Smith <br />Application of Harold and Marcia Gregerson and Gregory Smith to <br />rezone an approximately 2.0 acre site located at 4943 Foothill <br />Road from the "A" (Agricultural) to the R-1-6500 (Single-family <br />Resid~:ntial) zoning district or to any other zoning district <br />consistent with the General Plan. <br />Mr. Harris presented the staff report recommending approval of <br />Case R?-85-20. <br />The public hearing was opened. <br />Greg smith, applicant, presented his request. They want to <br />subdivide the property into 12 lots. They wish to put 2,000 sq. <br />ft. custom homes on 7200 sq. ft. lots. He indicated that he is <br />concerned with preserving the trees. They have consulted with <br />the landscape contract and feel they have addressed the concerns <br />adequately at this point. <br />The px~blic hearing was closed. <br />A motion was made by Commissioner Getty, seconded by Commissioner <br />Innes that the negative declaration prepared for Case RZ-85-20 be <br />recommended for approval inasmuch as the subject rezoning would <br />have an insignificant effect on the environment. <br />- 8 - <br />_ _ ..r._..._ __ _._ _ _ _ _ __ _. T <br />