PC 02/13/85 - Laserfiche WebLink

Minutes Planning Commissio; 2/13/85 Staff does not feel that any residential development would have an overwhelming burden on the street. A motion was made by Commissioner Lindsey, seconded by Commissioner Getty that the property described in Case GP-85-2 remain as currently designated, therefore, case GP-85-2 be denied. ROLL CALL VOTE AYES: Commissioners Getty, Innes, Lindsey, Wilson and Chairman Doherty NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Resolution No. 2606 was entered and adopted denying Case GP-85-1 as motioned. A motion was made by Commissioner Wilson, seconded by Commissioner Lindsey that the property described in Case RZ-85-4 remain as currently zoned and that Case RZ-85-4 be denied. ROLL CALL VOTE AYES: Commissioners Getty, Lindsey and Wilson NOES: Commissioners Innes and Chairman Doherty ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Resolution No. 2607 was entered and adopted denying Case RZ-85-4, therefore, leaving the current zoning intact. RZ-85-2, City of Pleasanton Application of the City of Pleasanton to rezone an approximately six acre area composed of all properties located on the north and south sides of St. Mary Street and the north side of Division Street between Peters Avenue and the Western Pacific Railroad right-of-way from the R-1-6500 (Single-family Residential) District to the RM-1500 (Multiple-family Residential) District or to any other zoning district consistent with the General Plan. A Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts will also be considered. Mr. Harris presented the staff report recommending the zoning be changed to RM-2500 zoning for all but the Amaral property. Commissioner Innes asked for an explanation of the density of RM-4000 and other residential zoning designations. Mr. Harris explained. The public hearing was opened. Alice Moore, 431 St. Mary St. understands that there is a need for apartments, but felt that the character of the residential - 11 -